post here funny pictures

  • Thread starter T-hug
  • Start date
  • Views 2,206,680
  • Replies 33,674
  • Likes 12

BrightNeko

Popcorn ball
Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2010
Messages
915
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
Texas
Website
Visit site
XP
389
Country
United States
tumblr_lsuqsnKcFQ1qbw2q1o1_500.jpg


I feel like one of the few people that understand the only reason the tail is there is because it is the "3" DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

mameks

in memoriam of gravitas
Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
2,300
Trophies
0
Age
29
Location
Charlotte's maze
XP
565
Country
United Kingdom
I can't simply link youtube any more so
THE FOLLOWING IS NSFW I think..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmThJBHvfqc&feature=player_embedded
:creep:

I can't simply link youtube any more so
THE FOLLOWING IS NSFW I think..
-snip-

It...was...Thhhhrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!

:tpi:
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I don't see what the problem is :tpi:
Neither :creep:
It's not actually that bad :ha:

gallery_183895_12_122233.png

1. http://americaisretarded.com/chemo.jpg The Journal of Clinical Oncology, Dec 2004.
2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17222789 Cancer Cell. 2007 Jan 11
3. http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/2/31/31ra34.abstract Sci Transl Med 12 May 2010
4. http://progressreport.cancer.gov/graphs-jpeg/lco1.jpg
 

Veho

The man who cried "Ni".
Former Staff
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
11,414
Trophies
3
Age
42
Location
Zagreb
XP
42,363
Country
Croatia
gallery_183895_12_122233.png

1. http://americaisretarded.com/chemo.jpg The Journal of Clinical Oncology, Dec 2004.
2. http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/17222789 Cancer Cell. 2007 Jan 11
3. http://stm.sciencema...31ra34.abstract Sci Transl Med 12 May 2010
4. http://progressrepor...s-jpeg/lco1.jpg

That's actually a bit misleading. Chemotherapy has a success rate of 40% in some cancers, and is completely ineffective in others, giving an average of 2% overall, but chemo isn't recommended where it doesn't do anything. The study on dichloroacetic acid that showed the 80% effectiveness was only done on one type of cancer, and the overall average is unknown.

And besides, sodium dichloroacetate (the compound actually used in treatment; dichloroacetic acid itself is volatile, horribly corrosive and toxic) is cheap, can be bought from pharmacies, some clinics already use it to treat cancer, and if you approach your doctor with the resources you posted up there, (s)he should have no problem in (highly unofficially) suggesting it as a treatment. It can't be prescribed or officially recommended for fear of horrible, horrible lawsuits (yet another problem with healthcare these days).

And the real question isn't why pharmaceutical companies aren't investing in clinical trials for a drug they can't make any money off (why would they?), it's why isn't anyone else paying for them. I'm looking at you, Bill Gates.


On to merrier topics: the economy!


Majzp.jpg


g9lV7.jpg


fYgAi.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: https://youtu.be/ALcfGYLXcjQ?si=ePdtM6b0p5sWaxof