Polyamorous or Open relationships

I'd do it if..

  • My partner had the same freedom to see others

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • My partner shared the experience(s) with me (physically, i.e. threesomes)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • My partner shared the experience(s) with me (verbally, i.e. introduced you or informed you about the

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I was in Vegas, since what happens there stays there..

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • There were no strings attached (i.e. aren't in a relationship to begin with)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It didn't put me at risk for STDs or parenthood

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Others didn't usually assume the worst about the lifestyle

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • no, I just wouldn't do it.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't know. Maybe. It really depends..

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

exangel

executioner angel
OP
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
1,571
Trophies
0
Age
40
Location
Tucson, AZ
XP
602
Country
United States
I tried to make a poll about this before and managed to screw it up, but I think it's okay this time. I also added a lot more possible answers.
Commence attempt #2!


jan777 said:
Also at Open relationships topic,
IMO women = whore/sluts
men = lucky
(no offence, just pointing out that it affect peoples view of you, especially today where people are very judgmental.)

Yeah. I recently saw a fake documentary-style film called the Girlfriend Experience about a woman in a really one sided open relationship-- she was living with her boyfriend who is faithful, but he knows she makes her living as a very high priced escort. Since she pays bills, and doesn't seem to concern herself with her customers for any more reason than they are her clients and they are real people, it carries on okay for a while.
So the guy brings it up with some buddies when he goes to Vegas one weekend, calling it an open relationship, and they're all like, why in the hell aren't you getting any extra here? That's not his motive, but it also reminds me of some Polys I knew as a teenager and young adult. I've heard of Poly men who had multi ladies but I've heard of (and actually met) a lot more Poly women who have multi partners (including other women). I think fewer men make the choice to have multiple partners even in Poly relationships, at least, outside of reality TV, but that comes from my life experiences and not any real data.

Also, the locale where you're living has a lot to do with how people view you. The long-term poly's I've known, people who are way past experimental, lived in the San Fransisco or NYC areas, and I've never actually known any outside of those areas that professed to actually love more than one partner. Everyone outside of those places that had multiple partners were just swingers, or people who wanted to add spice to a relationship that looked monogamous on the outside but was freaky in the bedroom.
Accordingly, people outside those two areas rarely seemed to separate polyamory from swinging or being outright promiscuous.
 

Gore

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
1,554
Trophies
0
Age
81
XP
370
Country
United States
Under super ideal perfect controlled circumstances (impossible) I think it could work out for me.
I'd go for a three way relationship with two different girls as long as all three of us want to all three be together.
I couldn't be with a girl who was also with another guy too though. Not if I cared bout her.
 

jan777

motion control..? srsly? so 2008. 3DS is teh bombz
Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
2,835
Trophies
1
Age
29
XP
878
Country
smileipb2.png


Yeah. Its just that a man who has 2 girlfriends is considered good with the girls,
while a girl with 2 boyfriends is considered a flirty person.

If they go for open relationships just for the sex, I dont get it because (assuming you and your partner are very sexually active) why not just do it with with each other? Its the same thing. (well maybe its different to some extent. I wouldnt know
laugh.gif
)

As for testing grounds for a closed relationships, maybe stay as friends first and get to know each other before going for a relationship. Fuck its so confusing.

Anyway, just my 2 cents. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion anyway.
 

exangel

executioner angel
OP
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
1,571
Trophies
0
Age
40
Location
Tucson, AZ
XP
602
Country
United States
Gore said:
Under super ideal perfect controlled circumstances (impossible) I think it could work out for me.
I'd go for a three way relationship with two different girls as long as all three of us want to all three be together.
I couldn't be with a girl who was also with another guy too though. Not if I cared bout her.
That seems to be the "average Joe" point of view I've been sold all my life, at least when I was among straight men talking about "open" relationships. It's much easier to imagine, or even fantasize, a pleasant situation with two loving ladies, than any other situation that isn't monogamous.

QUOTE(jan777 @ Nov 16 2010, 04:21 PM)
smileipb2.png


Yeah. Its just that a man who has 2 girlfriends is considered good with the girls,
while a girl with 2 boyfriends is considered a flirty person.

If they go for open relationships just for the sex, I dont get it because (assuming you and your partner are very sexually active) why not just do it with with each other? Its the same thing. (well maybe its different to some extent. I wouldnt know
laugh.gif
)

Anyway, just my 2 cents. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion anyway.
Yeah. The more I think about it (since it's been a long time since I even cared), the more I'm prone to think the double standard is more than an artificial social thing. I think it's also based on the reproductive motivation underlying the traditional straight relationship: A girl with two boyfriends may have paternity issues and conflicts if she becomes pregnant, but a guy that impregnates two ladies is clearly potent. Potency being the whole assertion of manhood, that's gotta be why a guy feels it's okay to have two ladies than compete with another dude for one.

I don't do relationships just for the sex at all, never have or will, it's a bonus round of the pleasure of genuinely loving another person in my opinion, but of people I knew who had multiple concurrent partners.. it's because they couldn't always have each other (one person being very distant for months at a time) or because they really just loved more than one person. And of the second type, a couple of those people were bisexual or lesbian women. I only new one guy who was alright with a Poly relationship with more than one male in it, and he was straight, and the other guy was his best friend.

Thanks for responding, was hoping you would since I started out by quoting you.
 

jan777

motion control..? srsly? so 2008. 3DS is teh bombz
Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
2,835
Trophies
1
Age
29
XP
878
Country
exangel said:
Gore said:
Under super ideal perfect controlled circumstances (impossible) I think it could work out for me.
I'd go for a three way relationship with two different girls as long as all three of us want to all three be together.
I couldn't be with a girl who was also with another guy too though. Not if I cared bout her.
That seems to be the "average Joe" point of view I've been sold all my life, at least when I was among straight men talking about "open" relationships. It's much easier to imagine, or even fantasize, a pleasant situation with two loving ladies, than any other situation that isn't monogamous.

QUOTE(jan777 @ Nov 16 2010, 04:21 PM)
smileipb2.png


Yeah. Its just that a man who has 2 girlfriends is considered good with the girls,
while a girl with 2 boyfriends is considered a flirty person.

If they go for open relationships just for the sex, I dont get it because (assuming you and your partner are very sexually active) why not just do it with with each other? Its the same thing. (well maybe its different to some extent. I wouldnt know
laugh.gif
)

Anyway, just my 2 cents. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion anyway.
Yeah. The more I think about it (since it's been a long time since I even cared), the more I'm prone to think the double standard is more than an artificial social thing. I think it's also based on the reproductive motivation underlying the traditional straight relationship: A girl with two boyfriends may have paternity issues and conflicts if she becomes pregnant, but a guy that impregnates two ladies is clearly potent. Potency being the whole assertion of manhood, that's gotta be why a guy feels it's okay to have two ladies than compete with another dude for one.

I don't do relationships just for the sex at all, never have or will, it's a bonus round of the pleasure of genuinely loving another person in my opinion, but of people I knew who had multiple concurrent partners.. it's because they couldn't always have each other (one person being very distant for months at a time) or because they really just loved more than one person. And of the second type, a couple of those people were bisexual or lesbian women. I only new one guy who was alright with a Poly relationship with more than one male in it, and he was straight, and the other guy was his best friend.

Thanks for responding, was hoping you would since I started out by quoting you.

laugh.gif


yeah I was surprised when you quoted me.

I guess i could understand the bisexual people having multiple partners (unless their partner is a hermaphrodite
ninja.gif
) but people in long distance relationships.. not so much.
Cause I am currently in LDR with my girlfriend (yes, we are too young, I know.) But its basically the same. I dont go around getting another girl just so I have someone to cuddle or do some stuff with (I trust that she does the same) because well, we love each other and it would hurt to see them being touched by another person. But idk. Thats just me and her though.
 

exangel

executioner angel
OP
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
1,571
Trophies
0
Age
40
Location
Tucson, AZ
XP
602
Country
United States
jan777 said:
I guess i could understand the bisexual people having multiple partners (unless their partner is a hermaphrodite
ninja.gif
) but people in long distance relationships.. not so much.
Cause I am currently in LDR with my girlfriend (yes, we are too young, I know.) But its basically the same. I dont go around getting another girl just so I have someone to cuddle or do some stuff with (I trust that she does the same) because well, we love each other and it would hurt to see them being touched by another person. But idk. Thats just me and her though.

Well, I mentioned the long distance deal in the other blog, and there's a bit more to that specific relationship. That couple had no choice but to spend a very long time apart, and they had agreed upon the rules: if one of them comes to care for and trust another (local) person, someone they want to be close with, it is better to introduce them to the long distance partner and make sure all parties understand the situation before anything else happens. It worked out for a pretty long time (to a young person), and the girl wound up cutting ties with the guy for other reasons after about two years of this arrangement. This couple was older than you are, and they made this arrangement out of respect for each other's needs, for some it may seem like a sacrifice to allow their partner to have a different partner, but I guess, to those two, they just wanted to make sure they both stayed completely honest with each other and didn't get hurt or go crazy from loneliness.

I'm not saying it's a great arrangement for people in LDR's, but to that couple in that situation, I think it kept them together a lot longer than it would've worked out if they tried to be in a completely monogamous LDR. This was back before webcams and skype, and phone bills got really bad for them at times.
 

monkat

I'd like to see you TRY to ban me. (Should I try?.
Banned
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
2,242
Trophies
0
Age
32
Location
Virginia
Website
www.monkat.net
XP
105
Country
United States
I think everyone knows how I feel about this.

Open and polyamorous relationships are just more free, and frankly, people like variety - personally as well as sexually.

I'm certainly not going to say it's necessary for a happy relationship, but it does help, assuming your relationship is one that's going to last. That is, if you trust each other completely, are honest with each other, and love each other, then you won't need to feel paranoid or unhappy about them.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • HiradeGirl @ HiradeGirl:
    don't
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Disagree
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Walk into his office
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Take a shit on his desk
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Refuse to elaborate
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Leave
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I'm fortunate to have had some managers over the years who I've straight up told to go fuck themselves, and not get in trouble for it. Help that I've been on the receiving end of that as well lmao
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Agreed, you can tell him you quit when you see him in court, (For defecation on property, charges)
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    There's a difference in a abusive management rather than one drilling into you for messing up
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Told my last boss that I was resigning and he was confused and asked if I was serious 😭🤣
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    My last boss got investigated for racial slurs and guess what happened to him
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    I luckily haven't had a boss in over 20 years, (independent contractor) but the people I do work for, it's pretty much like they my bosses, and yea some can be assholes. But there has been many jobs I've walked off and mailed they're checks back to them.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Bosses should yell at workers for mess ups they just need to know the difference in abuse and punishment
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    I don't abuse or curse at my employess, I feel like waving the gun around gets the point across just fine.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    A boss is basically a glorified baby sitter
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I respect one's that tells someone what to do clearly, warn them when they mess up and actually put work in with a crew
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    That's how all of my last managers have been in this job and my last one. Last time I had a manager where I was being micromanaged to hell and back was over a decade ago when I worked retail
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    My managers nowadays are perfectly fine assigning me a project and just checking in once every week or two
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I had to micromanage the managers
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    At my last job I (as an individual contributor, not a manager or supervisor or anything) used to be the one to tell my manager when I was traveling for work "hey I'm gonna be out of office between x and y dates, I got something on the other side of the country I'm gonna go work on"
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Which was not the normal dynamic for that role lmao
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Don't get to travel for my current job :(
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Had me started working 10 days in a row with different days off after that I was like no
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    On the bright side, I also don't even have to leave my house for my current job, so... could be worse
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Some of the shift workers were so bad it held us up from 10pm to 10am
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Some of the shift workers were so bad it held us up from 10pm to 10am