https://www.dailywire.com/news/33976/irony-social-media-mob-comes-sarah-jeong-who-ben-shapiro
So, thoughts? Does she deserve to lose her job? Do you buy her excuse? Do you think she's racist, lol?
Based on the fact that they had already vetted her social media history, she doesn't deserve to lose her job. It is believable that she was being satirical of racism directed at her from white people, though that's still not a good excuse for perpetuating what can be read as hate. No, I don't think she's racist at heart. If she is, the behaviors always repeat themselves eventually.So, thoughts? Does she deserve to lose her job? Do you buy her excuse? Do you think she's racist, lol?
Do any of the white supremacist type people do that cultural appropriation bollocks or the equivalent thereof? Much of the others I could possibly read* as "what if we did a word replacement" or a slightly more advanced version thereof but the only time I have seen it brought up by said people that rather enjoy their whiteness is to laugh at its existence.It is believable that she was being satirical of racism directed at her from white people
I wouldn't go THAT far, but I agree with the general statement. If we spent as much time on REAL ISSUES like we do worrying over petty bullshit, we'd be a better world... But, no... We're worried about someone saying mean things, like that has anything to do with the real world.Did the mean ol Asian hurt your poor wittle feefees, I swear I'm so ashamed to be white when I hear whites literally soaking their diapers with their own piss (maybe tears as well?)
Well, given that they fired someone else a few months back for offensive tweets, I guess we must be in good company with LGBT and disabled people. And anyone else who was offended by that person I suppose.Did the mean ol Asian hurt your poor wittle feefees, I swear I'm so ashamed to be white when I hear whites literally soaking their diapers with their own piss (maybe tears as well?)
First world problems..Well, given that they fired someone else a few months back for offensive tweets, I guess we must be in good company with LGBT and disabled people. And anyone else who was offended by that person I suppose.
I'll say it again, there's a difference between someone doing something in the present, and digging up their past to find skeletons from before they got their shit together. People (or at least most people) are in a constant state of evaluating and changing their behavior based on feedback. If they're not doing something anymore that clearly in hindsight was either harmful or distasteful, it's pretty safe to say they've seen the error in their waysWell, given that they fired someone else a few months back for offensive tweets, I guess we must be in good company with LGBT and disabled people. And anyone else who was offended by that person I suppose.
That person's posts were from the same time period as this person's posts. In both the current and the past case the tweets were several years old.I'll say it again, there's a difference between someone doing something in the present, and digging up their past to find skeletons from before they got their shit together. People (or at least most people) are in a constant state of evaluating and changing their behavior based on feedback. If they're not doing something anymore that clearly in hindsight was either harmful or distasteful, it's pretty safe to say they've seen the error in their ways
Is editorial staff at a major news publication, in a time when said publications frequently wander through activist territory (this one in particular endorses presidential candidates) as well as doing the whole partisan bit, rather than being conveyancers of happenings and relevant background for it, potentially holding what would appear to be abhorrent world views and willing and able to espouse them further not a cause for concern?I wouldn't go THAT far, but I agree with the general statement. If we spent as much time on REAL ISSUES like we do worrying over petty bullshit, we'd be a better world... But, no... We're worried about someone saying mean things, like that has anything to do with the real world.
Given that such things necessarily also mean a stop to the opposite then I would have to agree. I don't know how long it would have taken for "be the bigger man" to have worked and still oppose the means but I will take a good end anyway. That said compared to the other story under discussion then where that would clearly have been able to be considered a joke this is harder to see as one without what was apparently a hidden context.I don't like the NYT, but I'm happy at least them are putting some stop to this fad where supposedly 4chan style trolls are some kind of SJW crusaders. Yeah, hope they lose their "power" already.