DS-X is today for the NDS as the X-ROM was for the GBA.
Both groundbreaking. Both revolutionary.
Go DS-X!!
wow a ds-x fanboy
ds-x is pointless, you spent over $120, have unupgradeable 512mb memory, have no gba support, and heck more or less the same compatibility as the top slot 2 solutions, what's the point of slot 1 solution if it required continuous nitpicky update for their roms just like slot 2 solution
i would rather get m3l/scl, it's cheaper, you use microSD which can be used elsewhere, and heck the same compatibility as DS-X
acekard on the other hand, definitely has a point, it boosts 100% compatiblity and future proof (untill proven otherwise), now that's an advantage over slot 2 solutions
Stop_loading, we all knew before DS-X hit the market that the memory could not be "upgraded". For me, 512 is fine. No, I don't need to put 50 games, 100 music files and 2 movies on my card to play on my nds. Now, so far, there has been 1 (one, uno) update to the ds-x firmware that addressed SOME games not working. Now, if you take a look at the list, 99% of the games work. Also, being a slot 1 solution, I already know it does not play GBA games. Name 1 slot 1 device that does.
Lastly, if you think the AceKard is better than the ds-x, buy it! Just don't come crying back to the forum askiing for help because you are getting errors or you can't find a saved game!
And as far as the AceKard team member who posted things on here: oooookay. My question for you is this: why iin the hell didn't you address the problems with the AceKard(or at least have someone beta test it) before you released it on the market? Only after Shaun did YOUR job, did you decide to adress the issues. Why should we trust that you will be doing any fixes to the AceKard. Sorry, but your actions so far make it hard for me to trust that you will really support the AceKard.
I do not have a bias towards DS-X. I just call it like I see it and so far, DS-X is the best and only slot 1 solution that works. Period.