Linux

Discussion in 'Computer Games and General Discussion' started by zuron7, Aug 7, 2010.

Aug 7, 2010

Linux by zuron7 at 6:08 PM (1,718 Views / 0 Likes) 19 replies

  1. zuron7
    OP

    Member zuron7 RBYG

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,369
    Location:
    GPS not available in this area
    Country:
    India
    I have a 12 year old laptop with Windows 98 on it.I want to install Linux., so I want to know what distro is the best for it.

    Here are the specs:
    800MHz CPU
    256MB ram
    640KB of System Ram

    ASk if you need for more info
     
  2. Wabsta

    Member Wabsta you fight like a dairy farmer

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Messages:
    2,485
    Location:
    SCUMM Bar
    Country:
    Netherlands
    I don't really know much about Linux, since I'm not a great fan of it. What I do know, is that there are some really stripped down windows XP on the internet, that will run perfectly with that specs.

    If you do want linux, if I can remember right, there is one called Damn Small Linux or something right? Maybe you could try that.

     
  3. Thoob

    Member Thoob LOLmonade.

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,126
    Location:
    Scotland
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Damn Small would be a good bet for this machine. Or you could look for an older version of Ubuntu that will run on lower-spec hardware.
     
  4. Overlord Nadrian

    Banned Overlord Nadrian Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    6,671
    Location:
    Riviera
    Country:
    Belgium
    Many Linux distro's can run on those specs (of course, don't expect a lot of eyecandy). I suggest you try a distribution like Kubuntu if you haven't used anything but Linux before, though I'm not sure if it'd work out well.

    Otherwise, I'd suggest getting Ubuntu Netbook (yeah, Netbook, because it was made to run on low spec computers) or Linux Mint.

    Also, after looking around on Google for a sec, I found this topic, so you should have a look at it.
     
  5. zuron7
    OP

    Member zuron7 RBYG

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,369
    Location:
    GPS not available in this area
    Country:
    India
    Tried XP on it It's too slow.Especially booting
     
  6. Strider

    Member Strider Next to the mainstream

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    901
    Country:
    It really depends on what you want to do.... you're going at this from the wrong perspective.

    Also, it's more important to select the lean components for your use. Like xfce as light desktop environment in your case.
     
  7. Am0s

    Member Am0s Mojo Risin

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    741
    Location:
    England
    Country:
    United Kingdom
  8. FAST6191

    Reporter FAST6191 Techromancer

    pip
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    21,736
    Country:
    United Kingdom
  9. zuron7
    OP

    Member zuron7 RBYG

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,369
    Location:
    GPS not available in this area
    Country:
    India
    I'm going to try a OS that wabsta mentioned to me-MicroXP since I'm not that great at linux.
    If it doesn't work out I'll try the suggestions that you'll have given

    thanks
     
  10. nutella

    Member nutella Low Glycemic Index

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,097
    Location:
    Your nearest supermarket
    Country:
    Australia
    What he said. Puppy Linux is probably the best distro for computers with 256mb of RAM or less. If you plan on using wireless, make sure whatever you're using works with Linux (PCMCIA card or otherwise). That's probably the only issue you should have. Other than that, I say go for it. I run Puppy Linux on a computer with worse specs than that and it flies (considering how old it is).
     
  11. BoxShot

    Member BoxShot Chiyo-chan :3

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,447
    Location:
    Middle of the ocean.
    Country:
    United States
    I really don't think Kubuntu would even run well on a computer like that.

    I'd recommend Puppy or Antix.
     
  12. zuron7
    OP

    Member zuron7 RBYG

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,369
    Location:
    GPS not available in this area
    Country:
    India
    I got what I want and I burned the .iso image onto a disk and changed the boot sequence so that the cd boots first but no matter how many times I try it still goes back to Windows98.
     
  13. Elritha

    Member Elritha GBAtemp Addict

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,037
    Country:
    Canada
    Are you sure the iso image you burnt is a bootable image? If it isn't you'll have to either modify it to make it bootable before burning, or boot from a windows 98 startup floppy disk and install that way.

    If all that doesn't work out I'd recommend trying Xubuntu.
     
  14. Urza

    Member Urza hi

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    6,493
    Country:
    United States
    Debian variants in general (which includes all Ubuntu variants) are relatively resource-intensive.

    In addition to the multiple prior Puppy recommendations, Arch is a very lightweight, and full-featured distro. If you take the short amount of time to become familiar with the platform you can build a very efficient and effective machine.
     
  15. nutella

    Member nutella Low Glycemic Index

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,097
    Location:
    Your nearest supermarket
    Country:
    Australia
    Oh yes, how could we forget. Its quite daunting at first, but the documentation is tremendous. Its very satisfying having it setup and its a power users dream.

    And to the guy who recommended AntiX, thanks. I'm looking it up now.
     
  16. zuron7
    OP

    Member zuron7 RBYG

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,369
    Location:
    GPS not available in this area
    Country:
    India
    Thanks for your help guys Kubuntu works like magic.
    I made a mistake of burning the disk with one that was in-built with Windows.
    I used IMGBURN and it worked properly.
     
  17. t^2

    Newcomer t^2 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    35
    Location:
    IOS36
    Country:
    Canada
    I'm surprised Kubuntu works like magic on a low-spec computer, it's very resource-hogging.

    If you ever find it too laggy or just want to speed things up, try Xubuntu. It's much lighter and requires pretty much the same know-how to configure as Kubuntu. XFCE > KDE on low spec computers.
     
  18. nutella

    Member nutella Low Glycemic Index

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,097
    Location:
    Your nearest supermarket
    Country:
    Australia
    I was surprised too. But, whatever works, I guess...
     
  19. trumpet-205

    Member trumpet-205 Embrace the darkness within

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    4,363
    Country:
    United States
    Actually I would recommend Fedora LXDE Spin. Even Xubuntu is resource-hogging IMO.

    Like others have said, very surprised that Kubuntu works "like a magic".
     
  20. Nimbus

    Member Nimbus sudo /usr/bin make-me-a-coffee --nosugar --cream=1

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    913
    Location:
    Probably being lazy.
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Puppy Linux may work, it's pretty lightweight.
    Xubuntu is a long shot, but may be able to work
    Lubuntu (Ubuntu with LXDE Desktop Environment) may also be a good choice

    Either way, I commend you for at least considering Linux, you've made this hell-raven smile inside.
     

Share This Page