Long [and rather pissed off] rant follows...
DDJM said:
Shinigami357 said:
Wow... Far as I can tell, they took the cat in when it was sick, it got better for a while and now it's gotten worse. The chances it would die are quite high, which prompted not just him, but also his parents to decide that it should be put down. Except they don't have cash.
Again, there are *DOCTORS* for this, there are doctors who take care of animals and choose what's better to do for their life. Is he a vet? Obvioulsy not, so he has no right to do *ANYTHING* on the poor cat. I understand this is GBAtemp but medicines are not a game that everyone can play for free (or maybe this guy think he's playing Trauma Center on the Wii?).
Shinigami357 said:
Now I'm not sure how these home-made euthanasia attempts work out, but he seems more than confident he knows what he's doing, and I'm not one to judge intelligence. I'm assuming he understands what he is doing.
OMG, are you joking too? Home-made euthanasia what?! Kill animals is illegal. Period. He's not a doctor and he can't do a shit. And then what if the poor cat can still be saved? How the hell you know that he "has to die"? Maybe a good vet can still cure him and save his life. But just because the man "has no money" the poor cat has to pay with his life? Yeah right... so if tomorrow this man wakes up and "look sick" we all go to buy euthanasia and kill him right?
Shinigami357 said:
Yes, obviously the police in Italy can go to Canada to get him, huh?
I was obvioulsy provocating. But still what this man is going to do is illegal and you can't do that in any civilized country of this world.
Yes. Obviously, the bleeding-heart man knows no boundaries to his BS.
1. I did not say I was in any way for or against this procedure. I was saying they've looked into it, they've decided a course of action [derailed by lack of funds, which you obviously seem to ignore altogether].
2. Home-made euthanasia: not a real term, I used it because there is no available term and the description fits. Now I understand English prob isn't your first language, but it isn't mine either.
3. Yes, killing animals is illegal. I am now confessing the act of killing thousands of mosquitoes, ants etc [I claim self-defense,
though]. Horse owners regularly put down steeds that break their legs. Just because one man steps forward and says something does not mean you can crucify him.
4. QUOTE
so if tomorrow this man wakes up and "look sick" we all go to buy euthanasia and kill him right?
I sincerely hope your father considered condoms. I don't know how low the literacy rate of the internet is supposed to be, but the OP pointed out that the cat was found already in this state, got better, then degenerated into this state of health. Nothing goes into remission and then gets worse suddenly if it wasn't already critical. The fact that it did so is certainly more than just "looking sick".
Also,I don't know what you're trying to achieve or who you're hoping to impress with such a childish metaphor in the first place. Being in a considerably incurable condition [and the patient's consent if it can be had] is the only grounds at all for euthanasia, especially in humans. That you're clearly trolling by suggesting murder like it was funny is frankly retarded.
5. That you blindly parade around waving it in our collective face that your oh-so-great country has a humane pet society in seemingly every street corner adds nothing whatsoever to the topic. As is your incessant belief that if it was taken to a "DOCTOR" that a cure will suddenly arise from nowhere to save it, even after the OP pointed out quite clearly that he has indeed had it looked at.
You even suggest a cat shelter [that clearly has a "strict no kill policy" which wouldn't help him much; perhaps you should make it a habit to read your links yourself?] when it's abundantly clear [seriously, do people even read any more?] that the OP had himself taken the cat in and tried [unsuccessfully, true, but some things are out of our control] to nurse it back to health and that the cat is dying, one way or the other.
6. The two tempers who are vets [or vets-in-training] aren't quite as inflammatory as you, and are rather sympathetic toward his situation. The OP is taking their advice seriously [which disproves what seems to be your unending belief that the OP is some cat murderer or something] and is even re-considering his methods. Clearly, you [and your perfect pet-loving country] have never gone through his position where he is left with no choice, and though some of his choices and decisions might be questionable, he is at least trying to find something he can do and a way to do it. Whereas you say the same damn BS every friggin post.
7. Finally, [and again more proof that you either weren't taught how to read properly or are inept in English] the OP isn't killing the cat "because he has no money". Such thinking makes me lament at how shallow some people deem their fellows to be. Again, the cat is in pain and is dying. He wanted to give it safe euthanasia, but there simply wasn't a way that he can afford it. The fact that he didn't have money is why he was driven to this lose-lose choice of letting it die a protracted and painful death or try to do something instead. If he had a better alternative, he would have gone for it.
In fact, if I had any money whatsoever, I would have donated it to him just to shut you up.
PS
I also don't quite get what you mean by "obviously provocating". Is that a way to say you want to pick a fight? More trolling perhaps?
FFS.
---
Rant over.
PS
@Pyrmon
I only just got back to the temp now. Judging by the time stamps on these posts, you've probably finished it, one way or the other [I do hope you got professional help, but then life is not nearly as ideal as we wish it to be]. Again, sorry for your loss.