I'm not saying HIV is a scam.... but...

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Boywife
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
27,985
Trophies
4
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
39,504
Country
Antarctica
Several scientists backed it, even nobel prize recipients back then at around that time. you'd have to be crazy to think anyone nowadays would back it. Such a thing would completely destroy the public's trust in the medical industry, and there is too much money to be lost if this were to go public.

Here's another interesting video: Here is Dr. Robert Ballo being questioned on whether he may have had any involvement indirectly with the creation of aids.


Really? Because I am not finding a single one of them. Would you care to post some links to back up these claims? You act like there's just one system, when there's an entire world of people would more than willingly capitalize on these claims.
Also took my 10 seconds to research this
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/robert-gallo-invented-hiv-aids/
The video wasn't even a confession, in fact he just talked the discovery of the HIV/AID. He even mentioned that there's no way for him to have created something like HIV.
Side note
tl:dr

>Dr Wilner, who was an accomplished doctor for many years, and treated many aids patients, holds conference where he lays out the evidence for why he believes HIV is a money making scam perpetrated by Robert C Ballo and friends. He actually had no proof beyond claims. Nothing he said was peer reviewed nor backed up by anyone in the medical field. It's just his word and his word alone.

>He explains how the HIV test does not test for HIV but for immunity to HIV, and how it has a 99% chance of being incorrect. This is completely false and such a result would be impossible to cover up. Something like this would be easily found out and demand for change would have happened long ago.

> He explains how the CDC allowed many African American syphilis patients to go untreated to see how the disease would fair, despite the fact that they had treatments for it. The Tuskegee syphilis experiment was already well known and documented by this time. Him explaining it isn't relevant.

> HIV is a retrovirus and is harmless. This is grossly false and the countless people who have died from HIV/AIDS would prove such a false statement.

> The drug AZT which was used to treat cancer was discontinued as a cancer treatment because it was more harmful than cancer, but is now used to treat HIV patients, and is what causes AIDS. AZT wasn't found to be more harmful, it just found to not be very effective. It was later found to be more effective against HIV.

>There is no scientific paper that actually proves a link between HIV and AIDS. There is a paper, there are actually several in fact. A simple google search proves this wrong.

>AIDS has many causes; malnutrition, drug usage - medical and other etc. It's the shutting down of the immune system. AIDS has many methods of spreading, but is can also be caused by HIV.

> It is virtually impossible to transmit HIV through sex and even blood. It's possible to get AIDS through sex if you indulge in very disgusting sexual activities whereby you transmit STD after STD and are then constantly taking anti-biotic drugs that mess with your immune system. This isn't just false, it's flat out stupid. Honestly I request actual proof behind this claim.

> A little over 40 minutes into the conference, a patient with HIV has his blood drawn by Wilner, and said blood is then stuck into Wilner by Wilner himself. Actually this was only a claim and the blood was never tested. So we just have to take his word for this one.

> After this, Wilner takes many questions from reporters. He seemed completely at ease and a while into the questioning phase, I had actually completely forgotten that he had stuck himself with the blood of an HIV patient just less than half hour prior. He definitely seemed like he 100% believed what he was saying. This doesn't prove anything other than his on confidence in his beliefs. It doesn't matter if they are legit or not, he can still be confidant in them.

> Dr. Wilner died 6 months after this conference, and the cause of death was heart attack. It's believed by many that he was killed with the CIA's heart attack gun, which is in fact a real thing. http://www.military.com/video/guns/pistols/cias-secret-heart-attack-gun/2555371072001 Or maybe just the fact that he was 66 years old and someone at 66 dying from a heart attack is extremely common.

Anyway, Dr. Wilner explains it all better than I ever could. I left a lot out so watch the video. It's an hour and 13 mins, but it's worth the watch.
 
Last edited by The Catboy,

Damian666

Coder from Hell
Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
671
Trophies
1
Age
45
Location
In your code...
Website
damian666.16mb.com
XP
1,702
Country
Netherlands
latest


was first thing when I saw the title xD
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: Traps