I need a little help.....

Discussion in 'PSP - Games & Content' started by Neku_Sakuraba, Aug 29, 2010.

?

1000 or 2000?

  1. PSP 1000 (phat)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. PSP 2000 (slim)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Aug 29, 2010
  1. Neku_Sakuraba
    OP

    Member Neku_Sakuraba GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    296
    Country:
    United States
    Since these are the psps that can be hacked then which one should i get?
    Tell me which is better compatible for ps1 and psp iso's, which is a easier hack and does NOT require a second psp, which one is safer to hack, which one is better to play (like does feel better in the hand, controls, triggers, etc.) cause i'm gonna by a psp used soon and i want to know what to look for.
    Also can give you guys give me good detailed guide that gives me detailed instructions on how to safely hack a psp 1000 or 2000 (depending on your choice)

    Thanks In advanced I really appreciate it! [​IMG] [​IMG]
     


  2. N4RU70 FR34K

    Banned N4RU70 FR34K Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2010
    Messages:
    478
    Location:
    Aktsuki Hideout
    Country:
    United States
    I heard the first one was easier to hack, but that's all the knowledge I have about hacking the psp.
     
  3. prowler

    Member prowler Sony

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    9,473
    Location:
    Ragol
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Read the stickys http://gbatemp.net/t205696-how-to-softmod-your-psp

    1000 are all fully hackable
    2000 you have a chance of get a semi hackable motherboard.

    You know, these types of threads are really annoying, I might make a thread (or put it in my guide) about PSP types and going about buying them.
    Edit: Low attention span, I'll do it after.
     
  4. steve-p

    Member steve-p GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    503
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    i voted 1000 because they are solid, the newer ones feel like a toy.
     
  5. themuddaload

    Member themuddaload Creepin' hardcore.

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,099
    Location:
    West of the equator Sex: sure
    Country:
    United States
    i have both. i prefer the 2000. just get one of the limited editions that are guaranteed hackable...
     
  6. Rydian

    Member Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    27,883
    Location:
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Country:
    United States
    Compared to the 1000, the 2000 is lighter and it feels like there's parts missing, that might turn some people off who have a I-like-to-hold-heavy-things fetish, but the slim's 64 megs of memory really helps out with web browsing and a little homebrew (like the youtube/porn viewer).

    A guaranteed hackable 2000 is the best bet.
     
  7. themuddaload

    Member themuddaload Creepin' hardcore.

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,099
    Location:
    West of the equator Sex: sure
    Country:
    United States
    iirc the web browser still uses the same amount of ram that it does on the phatty psps. (are they ever going to update that piece o shit browser? seriously, the crappy nds opera browser is at least capable of using gmail...)
     
  8. Rydian

    Member Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    27,883
    Location:
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Country:
    United States
    Wow, yeah, that needs a fix.

    I wonder if it'd be as simple as hex editing the browser's files to change the amount of memory allocated and it's "danger zone" values.
     
  9. xist

    Member xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,861
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Use the high memory modified browser, not the standard PSP one.
     
  10. SifJar

    Member SifJar Not a pirate

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,022
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    OP: Compatibility with PSX and PSP games are identical, both require a second PSP to install CFW if they're over FW5.03, both are the same difficulty to install CFW (if they're on the same firmware; either below 5.03 is easy and doesn't require second PSP, either over 5.03 is "harder" because it needs a second PSP), the risk is the same with each, and finally IMO, the Slim is nicer to play. The Phat feels too bulky and cumbersome for my liking, and the buttons seem springier on a Slim to me.
     
  11. BobTheJoeBob

    Member BobTheJoeBob The most optimistic person on the temp. :)

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    1,691
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    PSX and PS1 are 2 different consoles. [​IMG]

    I would say Phat, but that's just me.
     
  12. SifJar

    Member SifJar Not a pirate

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,022
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    They have the same games though.
     
  13. xist

    Member xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,861
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    The whole PSX thing is just so fanboy....yes everyone knows that the PSX was essentially a multimedia version of the PS2; no nobody cares enough not to use PSX as an abbreviation for the Playstation.

    If you feel the need to point it out, i can guarantee that everyone else will feel the need to ignore the pedantic observation.
     
  14. BobTheJoeBob

    Member BobTheJoeBob The most optimistic person on the temp. :)

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    1,691
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    So me pointing out an error makes me a fanboy, OK..... And how is PSX an abbreviation for PS1, maybe for Playstation, but then you could just use PS1 as an abbreviation for Playstation.
     
  15. xist

    Member xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,861
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    If it was a one off 'har de har har' type thing no, but it got old years ago....

    People just prefer PSX and PS2 as their abbreviations for the systems.
     
  16. SifJar

    Member SifJar Not a pirate

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,022
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    PSX is a commonly used abbreviation for PlayStation, PS1 is an abbreviation for PSOne, which was a different console, but played the same games (it was a slim line PlayStation). The actual PSX was never released outside Japan AFAIK, and most people now use PSX as an abbreviation for PlayStation. Heck, on the back of my PlayStation memory card, it referred to itself as a "PSX Memory Card".
     
  17. prowler

    Member prowler Sony

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    9,473
    Location:
    Ragol
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    PSX was never released outside of Japan, if it was, you would of gotten your way Bob.
     
  18. BobTheJoeBob

    Member BobTheJoeBob The most optimistic person on the temp. :)

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    1,691
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    This is a PS1

    This is a PSX. As far as I'm concerned their different consoles, whether or not they play the same games.
     
  19. prowler

    Member prowler Sony

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    9,473
    Location:
    Ragol
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    We all know what one is.
    So what, you're going to tell everyone that has wrongly referred to PS1 as a PSX?
    I'd like to see that.

    Also, to make you more pissed http://filetrip.net/f9588-PSX2PSP-1-4-2.html
    Tell the person who made this to change the name
     
  20. xist

    Member xist ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΑ ΕΑΥΤΟΥ

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,861
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Also you better hunt down Dark Alex and tell him to correct all his CFW readme's.
     

Share This Page