- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 3,933
- Reaction score
- 147
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 29
- Location
- Dreamland.
- XP
- 851
- Country





Maikel Steneker said:I don't like how he takes full credit for the hack. I mean, this is pretty much all based on the work Fail0verflow did, right? Also, he says he looked for a way to enable homebrew without enabling piracy. That's not even remotely true. Releasing the master key for a system is conciously breaking the whole security the device has.

431unknown said:Maikel Steneker said:I don't like how he takes full credit for the hack. I mean, this is pretty much all based on the work Fail0verflow did, right? Also, he says he looked for a way to enable homebrew without enabling piracy. That's not even remotely true. Releasing the master key for a system is conciously breaking the whole security the device has.
Yeah thats what I meant by arrogant he pretty much takes full credit for breaking the PS3 wide open.

phoenixgoddess27 said:431unknown said:Maikel Steneker said:I don't like how he takes full credit for the hack. I mean, this is pretty much all based on the work Fail0verflow did, right? Also, he says he looked for a way to enable homebrew without enabling piracy. That's not even remotely true. Releasing the master key for a system is conciously breaking the whole security the device has.
Yeah thats what I meant by arrogant he pretty much takes full credit for breaking the PS3 wide open.
Unfortunately, that's what happens when you give people like that a tiny bit of praise...
They'll think they saved the world.
This interview is going to make him look worse than he already does.
And something about his face just screams... "Kick me".


luke_c said:Say all you want, but the fact is he still gave us the CFW. Most likely he could of patched lv1/2 to enable syscalls for Backup managers but he didn't, and just enabled Homebrew, he hasn't taken a step wrong in my opinion, sure he may be slightly arrogant. But honestly, if I was in that kind of position I'm sure I would be too.

Darkmystery said:luke_c said:Say all you want, but the fact is he still gave us the CFW. Most likely he could of patched lv1/2 to enable syscalls for Backup managers but he didn't, and just enabled Homebrew, he hasn't taken a step wrong in my opinion, sure he may be slightly arrogant. But honestly, if I was in that kind of position I'm sure I would be too.
The fact is that he is not thanking fail0verflow for their findings. Where he could not even be close to his CFW without them. fail0verflow did almost all the work, and don't even get decent credit for it from him.

Quoted from his old index, "props to fail0verflow for the asymmetric half". Most of it was engineered by himself, including the .pkg signing tools.Darkmystery said:luke_c said:Say all you want, but the fact is he still gave us the CFW. Most likely he could of patched lv1/2 to enable syscalls for Backup managers but he didn't, and just enabled Homebrew, he hasn't taken a step wrong in my opinion, sure he may be slightly arrogant. But honestly, if I was in that kind of position I'm sure I would be too.
The fact is that he is not thanking fail0verflow for their findings. Where he could not even be close to his CFW without them. fail0verflow did almost all the work, and don't even get decent credit for it from him.

Oh I'm quite addicted to him.monkat said:If you guys hate arrogant, you'll love this monkat guy!

