Gamevice to take Nintendo on again over its patent, in attempt to ban Switch sales in the US

HKPB2.jpg

Not sated with having already lost to Nintendo multiple times in the past, Gamevice is back at it again. This time, they've filed a yet another new patent infringement complaint against Nintendo, alleging that Gamevice's patent on attachable game controllers was infringed on by the Nintendo Switch and its Joy-Cons. Not only that, but the company has also appealed the case they lost earlier this month, when the United States Patent and Appeal Board threw out their case, deciding that a company can't patent controller devices that clip on to tablet-like hardware. According to the US International Trade Commission, the complaint was filed under the Tariff Act of 1930, which would prohibit the sale of imported products that infringe upon a pre-existing American patent, meaning if Gamevice is somehow successful in their goal, the Japanese-created Nintendo Switch wouldn't be able to be sold in America. From here, it's up to the USITC to decide if the case is worth investigating, where we might see another months-long court battle kick off once more.

Letter to Lisa R. Barton, Secretary, USITC; requesting that the Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, regarding Certain Portable Gaming Console Systems with Attachable Handheld Controllers and Components Thereof II. The Proposed Respondents are Nintendo Co., Ltd., Japan; and Nintendo of America, Inc., Redmond, WA.

:arrow: Source
 

RandomUser

Rosalina in Plush Form
Member
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
967
Trophies
1
XP
1,042
Country
United States
patents should forever expire 10 years after a product hits the market. copyrights on video games should expire too after 20 years of age and have to go open source
You can thank Disney for making the copyright lasting a long time. Trying to keep their characters from entering public domain.
Then there is an issue with trademark as they could classify Micky as their trademark thus preventing the public from using the character.
I could be wrong on that last bit though.
 
Last edited by RandomUser,
  • Like
Reactions: Ryccardo

scottydog27

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
8
Trophies
0
Age
38
Location
Plymouth, Massachusetts
XP
382
Country
United States
dude give it a break
you cant win this case if your allowed to win then that opens up law suits agenst other split controllers that are made for disabled people and that would be causeing problems for laws agensat people with disability discrimination
 

LightBeam

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
980
Trophies
0
XP
2,457
Country
France
Meh, I mean ... Maybe they are doing that because they think they can get turn this into their advantage and have a deal with Nintendo ? Or maybe I'm just thinking of that because I have just seen an episode of Better Call Saul a few minutes ago ... I can't think of them being so naive they could get something like "ban the Switch from US stores", they must have something behind their mind. Or maybe I'm just over thinking, who knows
 

ChibiMofo

Elon Musk is my dog
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2019
Messages
704
Trophies
0
XP
2,861
Country
Canada
Lets let Nintendo win "court costs" against these patent trolls (again) and see if they still have the stomach (read as: cash) to come back for another legal brutalization...
 

chrisrlink

Has a PhD in dueling
Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,569
Trophies
2
Location
duel acadamia
XP
5,777
Country
United States
the only way they can win is if the mob "disposes" of the lawyers pre trial as mush as i commend them for shutting down switch sales it's hopeless they'll just go bankrupt
 

ratamahatta

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Messages
44
Trophies
1
XP
609
Country
Australia
I think the headline should read:

Gamevice to take Nintendo on again over its patent, in a last ditch attempt to get some sort of settlement payment by being a pain in the arse.

But good chance they'll just be left with lots of court fees
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
This kind of action is economic cancer like many thing that plumb the system. I don't want to live in stoneage but why not just to fuck up all those people looking for money and likes.
 

Ev1l0rd

(⌐◥▶◀◤) girl - noirscape
Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
2,004
Trophies
1
Location
Site 19
Website
catgirlsin.space
XP
3,441
Country
Netherlands
It'll get thrown out. Probably even have the trademarks invalidated. Clip-on controllers are as old as time, the Switch's only new innovation on that end is bringing one to mainstream consoles.

A trademark needs to be consistently upheld for it not to fall into common use, in which case it becomes invalidated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JavaScribe

raxadian

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
4,393
Trophies
1
Age
41
XP
4,603
Country
Argentina
Again? Just how many lawsuits do this guys want to lose? Wireless remotes shouldn't be a valid patent, they have existed for like 80 years or something!
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Sorry I sat on them when they were open
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    eeewww
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I thought it was the toilet
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    okies. Time to go watch YT paranormal ghost things. L8er my luvs :D
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I got a massive clue
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    this mf def ain't watching ghost shit, he boutta beat his meat fr
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Nah he's about to be the ghost in your bedroom
    +1
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @K3Nv2, and leave ectoplasm all over the place
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:

    this is him being described
    +2
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    Sigh
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    Yawn
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @SylverReZ, I dislike the kind of drm where you have to play single player games online all the time bc of some verification bs
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @Xdqwerty, Don't use games that have Easy Anti-Cheat as its been exploited many times.
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @SylverReZ, my PC can't run most AAA games so i wont
    +1
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    Most of the modern AAA games
    +1
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @SylverReZ, I also heard one of the Prince of Persia games was so unfinished that it required the "24/7 online" drm so a puzzle could be done and the game could be finished. And that when the Ubisoft servers were closed the (cracked) game was impossible to finish or something like that
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @Xdqwerty, That's extra scummy. Ubisoft nowadays ship out incomplete games like Skull and Bones which was being worked on for nearly a decade now.
    +1
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @SylverReZ, i think they have been doing that since late 2000s
    +1
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    Either that or their old games were unfinished aswell but we can't notice it
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I like that games can be fixed after the fact, hate that it's being abused via beta tests... And DLC... I was a 7800 owner back in the day and loved Impossible Mission, turns out I couldn't beat it because it was actually impossible lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I never knew about it at the time but a fixed version was available but you had to mail in your broken copy lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    So that version is semi rare
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: So that version is semi rare