Someone mentioned that the hardest boss in a Zelda game was Thunderbird, the boss of the last temple of Adventure of Link. I disagree, the Dark Link AFTER Thunderbird was way harder, I could only beat AoL exploiting Dark Link. Shame on me.
Someone mentioned that the hardest boss in a Zelda game was Thunderbird, the boss of the last temple of Adventure of Link. I disagree, the Dark Link AFTER Thunderbird was way harder, I could only beat AoL exploiting Dark Link. Shame on me.
They tend to be (or at least, appear) biased when it comes to Wii games. For Example, when Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (a game previously given 10/10 on other systems) was released on Wii, they gave it a 6.5 or so (Note that the game was just the same as the original with only difference being graphics, which shouldn't warrant a 3.5 point deduction). Occasionally, Wii games will get fair reviews, but generally only if it is over-hyped or a flat-out big release.why do people hate game informer? the review seems fair to Zelda fans(including myself). i just dont get it. explanation anyone?
I saw that too...I hope it's real. It will definitely help with the wait.found on a popular seies of iso sites with wii in the name a demo has been posted not sure if its legit or not yet but downloading now
should no in about 15-20 minutes if its real as somone else on the forum's download is almost done (mine is an hour off as i dont have megaupload premium)
They tend to be (or at least, appear) biased when it comes to Wii games. For Example, when Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (a game previously given 10/10 on other systems) was released on Wii, they gave it a 6.5 or so (Note that the game was just the same as the original with only difference being graphics, which shouldn't warrant a 3.5 point deduction). Occasionally, Wii games will get fair reviews, but generally only if it is over-hyped or a flat-out big release.why do people hate game informer? the review seems fair to Zelda fans(including myself). i just dont get it. explanation anyone?
I have the game. I play it often. The only negative is the 60 fps to 30-40 fps, but it doesn't effect accuracy or precision at all. Online performs well the vast majority of the time as well. Matchmaking is the same. At the absolute minimum, it should have gotten 8-9.They tend to be (or at least, appear) biased when it comes to Wii games. For Example, when Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (a game previously given 10/10 on other systems) was released on Wii, they gave it a 6.5 or so (Note that the game was just the same as the original with only difference being graphics, which shouldn't warrant a 3.5 point deduction). Occasionally, Wii games will get fair reviews, but generally only if it is over-hyped or a flat-out big release.why do people hate game informer? the review seems fair to Zelda fans(including myself). i just dont get it. explanation anyone?
Ai? Controls? Framerate? Online performance and matchmaking? the graphics do massively affect the gameplay with an online precision series like this. I have played cod on multiple formats, and believe me, the lower wii scores are fair.
There is a leaked demo with several reports that it is real. Check out that one Wii Iso forum for dl.
Update: dude just uploaded an image of him playing the demo, it is real.
OT: Game Informer