Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Wii - Console and Game Discussions' started by Valwin, Nov 4, 2011.
Now for the complete 180 of the hate train for that so-called "blasphemous" Sonic Generations review.
I can see it, the game looks good. I'll definitely play it provided my WM+'s still work and the anti-piracy doesn't require too much work. I still CBA to get Return to Dreamland to work.
lol well cmon if the games is no good is not good that why Sonic generations got like a 6.5
I still think Sonic Generations should had got a better review... Also is this the same person who view that game?
Anyway, pretty sweet.
I just remember people saying Game Informer was trash and terrible when they gave it a 6.5 (even though Eurogamer gave it a 7 and the average is around 76% for the game) and even wrote them off as "worse than IGN". Now they're giving a widely anticipated game a 10/10 and I'm sure people will be repainting the hate train to become the praise train.
but i wonder if people see the reviews for the previus games like do sonic games ever get a good score
wow. the last game i remember GI giving a 10 to was BioShock.
God I fucking hate Bioshock. But that's a long story.
Maybe Game Informer does give shitty reviews after all...
Didn't batman arkham city get a 10 from them?
Oh Guild you are always pissy about something
I dont know, i guess its been a while since ive gottent their mag. I need to resubscribe.
For the record, games with a perfect "10" by them:
Super Mario World, reviewed in October 2000 in a Classic GI Review,
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2, reviewed in November 2000,
Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty, reviewed in December 2001,
Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, reviewed in December 2002,
Metroid Fusion, reviewed in January 2003,
Grand Theft Auto III/Vice City, also reviewed in January 2003,
The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker, reviewed in April 2003,
Ratchet & Clank: Up Your Arsenal, reviewed in November 2004,
Halo 2, reviewed in December 2004,
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, also reviewed in December 2004,
Resident Evil 4, reviewed in March 2005 for Gamecube and November 2005 for Playstation 2,
God of War, reviewed in April 2005,
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, reviewed in January 2007,
BioShock, reviewed in September 2007,
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, reviewed in December 2007,
Grand Theft Auto IV, reviewed in June 2008,
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, reviewed in July 2008,
Uncharted 2: Among Thieves, reviewed in November 2009,
God of War III, reviewed in April 2010
StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty, reviewed in October 2010
Batman: Arkham City, reviewed in November 2011.
and The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, which was reviewed in November 2011.
I just really hate Bioshock. Like with a passion. Maybe it's because everyone thinks it's amazing and I thought it was mediocre, maybe I've had bad experiences with some people's obsession over it, maybe I just have a stick up my pooper, but I have a secret hatred of Bioshock.
Well according to many fanboys here, Gameinformer is fake and bias, so I guess this review is also fake and bias
you mean the sonicfanboys
Game Informer rates games will high attention highly so you will go into Gamestop and buy it.
22 games in 11 years? Yeah. That's pretty fantastic statistics.
Oh and IGN said it's the best Zelda game ever.
Gameinformer is shit, this little 10/10 makes me worried about the game now -_-
FUCK game informer. Those games don't even deserve close to a 10. Tony Hawk? TONY FUCKING HAWK?
Remember the times. In 2000 it was so outstanding.
Did you ever play any of those games? You could easily log tons of hours and fun into THPS2, given the levels, stuff to do, and great soundtrack, im pretty sure these games deserve 10s. and i personally agree with alot of GIs reviews.
Wow, impressive and good to know!