EZlite Micro uses microSD cards, and EZlite Mini uses miniSD, right?
MiniSD cards are much cheaper than microSD. Keep that in mind before buying.
I have both, and I would recommend the miniSD over the microSD. The miniSD has better performance, and the cart has a MUCH better build quality.
Don't make assumptions and state them as fact. There's every chance that it IS the EZ4L at fault, since I remember someone saying even their previous gen EZ4 always skipped on the Castlevania test. We won't know for sure until someone can test micro SD with an M3 Lite/Supercard Lite.Yes. microSD cards are slower than miniSD cards, and therefore there is noticable lag and load time on many games with the Lite. microSD is not as mature a media as mini/regular SD yet. It's not the fault of the EZ-Flash IV Lite, it's the fault of the media.
Good idea, someone must have a micro SD and one of the old SD based carts lying around.use a micro sd in a sd adapter in a m3 sd or a supercard sd, check if it's slower/there's lag. So we should know if it's media's fault or not.
Don't make assumptions and state them as fact. There's every chance that it IS the EZ4L at fault, since I remember someone saying even their previous gen EZ4 always skipped on the Castlevania test. We won't know for sure until someone can test micro SD with an M3 Lite/Supercard Lite.
Further, speed benchmarks like this show micro and mini are about on par speed-wise, in fact for read speed micro seems better than mini:
micro - http://www.valuemedia.co.uk/tf_chart.htm
mini - http://www.valuemedia.co.uk/minisd_chart.htm