I'm sorry to inform you that cover art critique is entirely relevant. The publishers obviously realize this since they radically change the cover to see if it will affect sales. And this is still shitty box art. I can't really tell who is attacking and who is parrying but in either case, how is the guy with the sword expecting to parry with the thinnest part of the sword, it's edge, or the guy with the axe expecting to attack with the top of the axe. Clearly, neither of the combatants has any clue how to fight. I wonder if those characters were even drawn together or whether they were drawn separately in "cool" poses and then just placed together in the hopes that it would produce a "cool" composite.i just wanna say that i personally tire of hearing all the "cover art critique", so truly inane.Â
Damn Kirby syndrome
In my opinion, Anno 1701 is a tonne better.in the icon it looks like they are having an orgy....lol...
i didn't like this game.
LOL. I Agree.
How does this compare to silky Anno 1701? Better/worse/hugely inferior?
Caution: The european version is extremly buggy! Unplayable buggy. Game freezes, missions can't be completed, icons vanish and so on. I loved that game on my pc and was happy to find that game for my ds, but it really really sucks.Â
Haha, the cover... so it's true, that u need some fighting and war on a boxart to sell a game in the usa?ÂÂ
The Settlers (aka Die Siedler) originaly was a game where u build a whole villiage with an infrastructure.
The "fighting" part was just a very little part of the game (until Settlers 4 came out), so the European Boxart
is way better imo.