Hacking DIS - DSIHax Injection Service

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blackfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 39,741
  • Replies Replies 128
  • Likes Likes 12
That would be me. I'm not sure what could be causing that. I'm running seedminer from homebrew, and it kicks out that file into the seed starter. The only change is me renaming it from moveable_1 to moveable. Any ideas what could be causing this?
You have to brute force the movable.sed.

Movable_part1.sed is the input file from the user for seedminer.
Movable_part2.sed is an output file for seedminer but it's "office use only" You aren't supposed to touch it.

movable.sed is the output file of a succesful brute force, that is what you are suppposed to upload.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marenthyu
You have to brute force the movable.sed.

Movable_part1.sed is the input file from the user for seedminer.
Movable_part2.sed is an output file for seedminer but it's "office use only" You aren't supposed to touch it.

movable.sed is the output file of a succesful brute force, that is what you are suppposed to upload.


Hah, thank you. That makes much more sense now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zoogie
What's really crazy about this is I have an ALL CAPS warning not to upload part1 and part2 but people keep doing it. :/

Screenshot-2018-4-24 Jenkins.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marenthyu
What's really funny is that I did this once already and forgot not to do that a second time.
I believe that the issue is people are in a hurry and just click on the buttons without reading. It's understandable.

The other issue is that movable_part1.sed looks like movable.sed so people think they're the same. That's my fault and I take some blame for using that choice of filename.

I should separate movable_part1.sed to lfcs.bin and id0.bin to reduce confusion (and for other reasons). That will probably be in the next update.
 
I believe that the issue is people are in a hurry and just click on the buttons without reading. It's understandable.

The other issue is that movable_part1.sed looks like movable.sed so people think they're the same. That's my fault and I take some blame for using that choice of filename.

I should separate movable_part1.sed to lfcs.bin and id0.bin to reduce confusion (and for other reasons). That will probably be in the next update.
How about possibly adding a few explanations to our guides? So, tell people to look out for the Build Status and if it failed, to look at the console.

I'll write something up for my guide if i have a bigger break at work today, otherwise later when im home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blackfall
Hey, sorry, about the page, you see, when i change the name that in mi case is xxxxxxxx.BIN.patched_Senraid the file it became imposible to copy back to the console.
 
Hey, sorry, about the page, you see, when i change the name that in mi case is xxxxxxxx.BIN.patched_Senraid the file it became imposible to copy back to the console.
This is usually when someone uses an incompatible dsiware game.
Which dsiware game did you use?
 
sudoku, but i go back over my steps and i found i had a problem when the file was created, right now the nintendo is already overwriting it self so everything is fine now. Thanks anyway and sorry. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: zoogie
After doing the process, and replace the game, I start it and a green screen appears and nothing else. What could have happened?
Please if you can contact me by whatsapp I would appreciate it. +34 697875007 (Spain)
 
Hey, sorry this is my first post! New to the scene.

Just a suggestion, maybe make a note on the product page, telling people that the wait time is becoming exponential because of duplicates. It is not easy to see that you are queuing for a queue, one that is fairly hidden from any search function until AFTER your almost 5 hr wait at this point.

I see many, MANY duplicates in this list. Some have more than 20+, some have been trying and trying for an hour with the same name. This CAN be fixed with a notice. I still see many duplicates being added as of writing this post. I could list here many usernames who have created 5 in a row, obviously after doing it many times before.

Sorry if I sound like a dick but this should probably be fixed before things go down.

EDIT: And I'm fairly positive there is no duplicate protection, as I see the same name come up frequently in the latest builds. I don't think many people are really here. Just enough to tip the balance, make people confused, and send in crazy amounts of dups.
 
Last edited by ProteanCarnage,
I'm already improving this so the queue will get faster done and also thinking about some kind of multi job prevention which is making some problems because if I only add some username protection people will user others...i can't restrict it to user since every user is using the "anonymous"-account...i need to do some ip restriction with nginx which will be my next step after adding some kind of loadbalancing
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProteanCarnage
I'm already improving this so the queue will get faster done and also thinking about some kind of multi job prevention which is making some problems because if I only add some username protection people will user others...i can't restrict it to user since every user is using the "anonymous"-account...i need to do some ip restriction with nginx which will be my next step after adding some kind of loadbalancing

People aren't trolling though.. they are misguided and hoping it will work. Many usernames are being used like "ihopethisworksthistime", and "Thisappsucks", which kinda seems like people just aren't getting it. Put something in red. Say that the wait time is a few hours and that once its done they can search their username. Should stop 90% of the duplicates without all of this extra work on you.
 
I've added some more jobs until my loadbalancing is done.
Feel free to use one of this jobs (only add 1 job. no need for multiple tries when the first hasn't failed)
Job1
Job2
Job3
 
  • Like
Reactions: zoogie

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum