In short... nintendo doesn't care if you install a chip.
They make a lot of money on their consoles. So what if you brick one? Another 150 bucks pure profit in nintendo's wallet.
Who they're attacking are those pirates in china who are selling pre-chipped Wiis and SELLING backups in retail stores.
Copyright? Copyright is a blanket concept. It's all about revenue theft. The RIAA didn't go after napster because they felt that it was "wrong."
They sued because they saw it as thousands of people stealing their revenues.
No concept can be owned, because even if it's lost forever, it will be rediscovered.
They make a lot of money on their consoles. So what if you brick one? Another 150 bucks pure profit in nintendo's wallet.
Who they're attacking are those pirates in china who are selling pre-chipped Wiis and SELLING backups in retail stores.
Copyright? Copyright is a blanket concept. It's all about revenue theft. The RIAA didn't go after napster because they felt that it was "wrong."
They sued because they saw it as thousands of people stealing their revenues.
No concept can be owned, because even if it's lost forever, it will be rediscovered.