IRL? Okay, good luck guys. Thanks again for sharing.
In real life, lol, nevermindjust everyone's been really busy IRL lately![]()
In real life, lol, nevermindjust everyone's been really busy IRL lately![]()


Well, yesterday I had an idea of exactly how to accomplish putting SOME 3-core support into apps made with libogc (like most of the stuff you run from the HBC) It wouldn't be as versatile and easy to use from the programmer's point of view as Linux would be but it would theoretically give a big boost in processing power (kinda the "number crunching" that Marcan mentioned in his blog.) I'm coding up a test for this concept now but we'll see what actually becomes of it.is there any progress on 3core other than Linux ?

Well, yesterday I had an idea of exactly how to accomplish putting SOME 3-core support into apps made with libogc (like most of the stuff you run from the HBC) It wouldn't be as versatile and easy to use from the programmer's point of view as Linux would be but it would theoretically give a big boost in processing power (kinda the "number crunching" that Marcan mentioned in his blog.) I'm coding up a test for this concept now but we'll see what actually becomes of it.

Theoretically, yes.So, theoretically, if someone ported Wii 64 to work in the tri-core Linux, one could get a potential speed boost?

Theoretically, yes.


Linux itself shouldn't, no. Running it in the background, it just kinda sits there and waits until the application asks for it's help. If Linux wasn't there to offer it's help, though, then the application itself would have to take care of everything by itself and so what extra CPU time you "save" by not running Linux is extra CPU time the application now has to spend anyway.I thought running linux in the background will use up some of the CPU.

Linux itself shouldn't, no. Running it in the background, it just kinda sits there and waits until the application asks for it's help. If Linux wasn't there to offer it's help, though, then the application itself would have to take care of everything by itself and so what extra CPU time you "save" by not running Linux is extra CPU time the application now has to spend anyway.
What DOES happen, though, is that Linux would then allow you to be running more than one thing at a time so if YOU had something else running in the background (like a web server, antivirus, or you're just using music player at the same time) then THAT might cause a problem.

Yes, that would be a bit of a concern. It shouldn't be too much, no, but the Wii doesn't exactly have a lot either.Oh, okay.
Linux will use some memory too, but it shouldn't be too much..?

The build really shouldn't be all that big (although not sure of exact numbers off the top of my head ATM) You have to remember, though, that right now we're dealing with vWii on Wii U so we only get access to the same memory we had on a normal Wii and that's only ~78mbHow large of a Linux build do you think would be required to provide the services that would be useful to homebrew? Also, is there any way to unload the parts of the memory that the Wii U reserves for its own software? If you could free up that gigabyte of memory, or even part of it . . .
The build really shouldn't be all that big (although not sure of exact numbers off the top of my head ATM) You have to remember, though, that right now we're dealing with vWii on Wii U so we only get access to the same memory we had on a normal Wii and that's only ~78mb



I was actually contemplating something like that at one point. You could start by trying to install the decrypted system menu as another title for testing as not to run the risk of bricking by overwriting the real one. (maybe 00000001-00000001 instead of 00000001-00000002 since vWii has no boot1/boot2)Partially off-topic but here it goes:
has anyone tried to to install a decrypted system menu to their vWii? (or at least if someone with a hardware NAND flasher setup and a backup; try it).
I am guessing that would mean the decypter would need to be modified to output a file with the encrypted contents decrypted plus extra stuff vs just the encrypted portion (or did I misinterpret what the decrypter does)
basically, I would like someone to test (or post if they already have tested it) repacking a system menu wad with the decrypted 00000017.app and see if the system menu will still function with it decrypted.
I would try it myself but I have no hardware flasher nor the soldering skills to install one and have vWii even function by the time its installed.
if it does work, that would allow something like Priiloader to work with vWii if its patches were updated for the vWii system menu as everyone's decrypted system menu (from same region and firmware version) should the same.