CBHC vs CBHC+autoMocha+(redNAND)

Discussion in 'Wii U - Hacking & Backup Loaders' started by GBA rocks, Jan 24, 2017.

?

What coldboot setup do you prefer?

  1. just CBHC

    10 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. CBHC defaulting to Mocha

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. GBA rocks
    OP

    GBA rocks GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    366
    98
    Jan 4, 2013
    What coldboot setup do you prefer?

    In terms of
    - boot time
    - brick risk and recovery
    - other pros and cons

    I was set on just plain CBHC but also CBHC default booting to Mocha doesn't sound bad. Not sure about boot times though.

    Why are you people using CBHC+Mocha doing it? Is the risk of conflicts doubled? Advantages?
     
  2. VashTS

    VashTS Beat it, son

    Member
    3,901
    702
    Mar 14, 2009
    United States
    Upstate NY
    just cbhc - i dont see a need for rednand yet. if it becomes necessary, then i shall convert.

    im hoping that nintendo is straight up done with wii u and 5.5.1 is it.
     
  3. xtheman

    xtheman GBAtemp Guru

    Member
    5,847
    5,275
    Jan 28, 2016
    United States
    No real value to booting mocha with cbhc as of right now. redNAND isn't needed and likely will stay that way for a while.
     
  4. GBA rocks
    OP

    GBA rocks GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    366
    98
    Jan 4, 2013
    (hope the "+(rednand)" in brackets doesn't distract from the fact that the thread is mainly about Mocha)
     
  5. xtheman

    xtheman GBAtemp Guru

    Member
    5,847
    5,275
    Jan 28, 2016
    United States
    FIX94 himself says mocha with cbhc is only good for redNAND. If you use it for sysnand it takes like 2 minutes to boot. So most are going to say redNAND with Mocha
     
  6. GBA rocks
    OP

    GBA rocks GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    366
    98
    Jan 4, 2013
    I see.