Hacking CBHC vs CBHC+autoMocha+(redNAND)

[GBA rocks]

What coldboot setup do you prefer?

In terms of
- boot time
- brick risk and recovery
- other pros and cons

I was set on just plain CBHC but also CBHC default booting to Mocha doesn't sound bad. Not sure about boot times though.

Why are you people using CBHC+Mocha doing it? Is the risk of conflicts doubled? Advantages?

 

[VashTS]

just cbhc - i dont see a need for rednand yet. if it becomes necessary, then i shall convert.

im hoping that nintendo is straight up done with wii u and 5.5.1 is it.

 

[xtheman]

No real value to booting mocha with cbhc as of right now. redNAND isn't needed and likely will stay that way for a while.

 

[GBA rocks]

(hope the "+(rednand)" in brackets doesn't distract from the fact that the thread is mainly about Mocha)

 

[xtheman]

(hope the "+(rednand)" in brackets doesn't distract from the fact that the thread is mainly about Mocha)

FIX94 himself says mocha with cbhc is only good for redNAND. If you use it for sysnand it takes like 2 minutes to boot. So most are going to say redNAND with Mocha

 

[GBA rocks]

I see.