Aww Hell No!! :(

  • Thread starter Thread starter moozxy
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 8,919
  • Replies Replies 88
@moozy,
I just saw your post man, Sorry I missed it earlier and again the "Suck My Balls" comment was at no point targeted towards you. I just assumed everyone had seen that south park episode and me being so anti-religion well... that fact that the Mormon character could make so much sense just left an impact on me. (He made sense accept for the whole pushing of religion thing which still makes me upset)

Regardless your talking about law now and I currently live in the land of the free. Originally I believe this country was desired as a place to practice your own religion freely...which ended up being primarily the Jesus loving religion and it only started as of recently that other religions where like "Can we come too" and now there is a cluster fuck in the USA.

Ironically I just had a similar debate over the 400 polygamist that where arrested in Texas who where part of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. They broke laws, thought they were above the law, ect, ect, ect.

It is a hard line to walk, American laws are all based of the holy bible, so much in fact that up in till recently it was on their money, on their public buildings, and you even had to swear on it in court. So what happens when the laws your supposed to live by go against your beliefs and current religion. Thats primarily the reason I think America is so fucked up because there is so many bible thumpers in office and they are the ones making the messed up laws. So to me, I could really care less that these guys go beyond the law. If Will Smith gets caught killing someone to keep them quiet of fucking a 12 year old that I'll reserve judgment but for now he is just a dude who believes some crazy shit and makes some pretty good movies.
 
kpeezy said:
Panzer Tacticer said:
sinkhead said:
Panzer Tacticer said:
All religions (the flaky fringes and the old established ones) have things that make them NOT ideal selling points to be a member of.

Currently we are slagging Scientology (which only a nut calls a religion in the first place).

But take Catholics for instance. Is it logical to assume that all Catholics advocate screwing little boys just because they have trouble with some priests doing this?
Using this analogy, the Bible says it's OK to screw little boys.

Scientology's books contain all this stuff. They say Jesus was a paedophile (correct spelling, UK) and lover of young boys, they say that homosexuality can be cured, they say that critics can be lied, tricked, sued or destroyed and so on...

You have an odd quoting style
smile.gif


The bible actually DOES say some odd things though. I have a pet fondness for laughing at Liviticus (the guy the started homo bashing). He also states you can kidnap girls as long as they are not from your country, and you can do what you want with them.

I can show you documentation that actually can illustrate Jesus never existed in the first place (thus making it hard for him to be anything at all). I'm sure anyone can be cured of anything in the mind of a Scientologist (as long as you have enough money). Pity they can't cure people from being poor eh
smile.gif

You got called on your bullshit analogy. Take it like a man instead of spouting off more bullshit.

I don't think YOU know what you are talking about let alone myself.
I never even made an analogy in the first place, and the original quoter using the term analogy in his post doesn't make my comment into an analogy. I suggest you learn what an analogy is (along with the original quoter).
 
Panzer Tacticer said:
kpeezy said:
Panzer Tacticer said:
sinkhead said:
Panzer Tacticer said:
All religions (the flaky fringes and the old established ones) have things that make them NOT ideal selling points to be a member of.

Currently we are slagging Scientology (which only a nut calls a religion in the first place).

But take Catholics for instance. Is it logical to assume that all Catholics advocate screwing little boys just because they have trouble with some priests doing this?
Using this analogy, the Bible says it's OK to screw little boys.

Scientology's books contain all this stuff. They say Jesus was a paedophile (correct spelling, UK) and lover of young boys, they say that homosexuality can be cured, they say that critics can be lied, tricked, sued or destroyed and so on...

You have an odd quoting style
smile.gif


The bible actually DOES say some odd things though. I have a pet fondness for laughing at Liviticus (the guy the started homo bashing). He also states you can kidnap girls as long as they are not from your country, and you can do what you want with them.

I can show you documentation that actually can illustrate Jesus never existed in the first place (thus making it hard for him to be anything at all). I'm sure anyone can be cured of anything in the mind of a Scientologist (as long as you have enough money). Pity they can't cure people from being poor eh
smile.gif

You got called on your bullshit analogy. Take it like a man instead of spouting off more bullshit.

I don't think YOU know what you are talking about let alone myself.
I never even made an analogy in the first place, and the original quoter using the term analogy in his post doesn't make my comment into an analogy. I suggest you learn what an analogy is (along with the original quoter).

I know exactly what I'm talking about. That point is clearly an analogy. I suggest you go and read up on what an analogy is.

edit: Little wiki for you - "An analogy can be a spoken or textual comparison between two words (or sets of words) to highlight some form of semantic similarity between them. Such analogies can be used to strengthen political and philosophical arguments, even when the semantic similarity is weak or non-existent (if crafted carefully for the audience)."
 
People who think scientology is the same as other religions really should have their heads examined.

Or better yet, just read up on the religions you criticize. Only an IDIOT would say that scientology is the same as other religions after learning the facts.

Concerning Will Smith, well his movies suck. His acting sucks. He always plays the same character in every film. So not supporting his career is no big deal for me.
 
feds4u said:
He always plays the same character in every film.


Speaking as someone who has worked in the entertainment industry for years, you cannot hold that against him, as the majority of celebs in the entertainment industry, who fall into the category of "Star", are the same in every role ... it's what their fans expect ... it's what the studios expect ... If a star changes too much, he will stop getting work ...

If you want versatility, watch things with "Actors" in, not things with "Stars" ...
 
science said:
beck is scientologist

That's a damn shame.

Bob Evil said:
QUOTE(feds4u @ May 23 2008, 02:36 AM) He always plays the same character in every film.


Speaking as someone who has worked in the entertainment industry for years, you cannot hold that against him, as the majority of celebs in the entertainment industry, who fall into the category of "Star", are the same in every role ... it's what their fans expect ... it's what the studios expect ... If a star changes too much, he will stop getting work ...

If you want versatility, watch things with "Actors" in, not things with "Stars" ...

Popular method actors say "hello."
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum