- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 1,064
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 28
- Location
- The dark part of your house
- XP
- 2,570
- Country
well, that is true, however then again who ever turns off their switch? I just put it to sleep almost 100% of the time
well, that is true, however then again who ever turns off their switch? I just put it to sleep almost 100% of the time
That's a good point, I didn't think of that o:well, that is true, however then again who ever turns off their switch? I just put it to sleep almost 100% of the time
Even if it is really hard to believe, there exist these battery worrying freaks. People that go around with tinfoil hats, telling tales that you shouldn't leave your Switch on the dock because it will make the battery explode, and that you should turn it always completely off so the government can't spy on you and also make your battery explode.well, that is true, however then again who ever turns off their switch? I just put it to sleep almost 100% of the time
Plus there is a software bug that is already usable. So really no need for tx, unless you want to dish a lot of cash.
you would need to modify the bootrom for that to work in my understanding.. what is going to tell the usb stick to launch the set of instructions? hence again, the need for modchip
they would probably would come up with a solution that would allow to switch between switchos and linux without powering off. I mean since they have full control over the system, it could be possible, in theory, to have it that the switchos side is patched so it could just reload to linux, and the linux side could just launch the switch side with signpatches and turning off switch secruity, similar to how on 3ds you can give full arm9 accesses even while during 3ds mode. Which would allow you to drop the switch os and load back into linux. Course easier said than done, but it's sounds like just a matter of memory management.people will want dual booting solutions, to play online, to boot linux, etc.. thus the need for modchip.
Here is the thing, I never will support tx. Plain and simple.TX is the same exploit. You might want to buy one of their mod chips if you don't want to have to carry a PC around with you.
I would pay a lot of money for a modchip, just not to TX.people are so cheap to spend a normally the price of a game on a modchip for convience and options, while stealing multiple $60 games , a logic i dont understand..
Also, for me, I'm really burned on the 360. I'm angry that practically everyone just gave up on a software exploit, so now you pay up or give up.I would pay a lot of money for a modchip, just not to TX.
Money is not a problem here, it's not about "cheapness", it's about thinking the provider is dishonest.
PS: Also, I don't plan to stop buying $60+ games monthly.
they would probably would come up with a solution that would allow to switch between switchos and linux without powering off.
im sure there will be many clones, but tx will obviously be the first to market.
Why can't we just dump NAND from the Switch, eliminating the need for a PC
The same exact reason everyone gave up. In order to beat the hypervisor (secruity gaurd dog) you need to learn about the hypervisor. Problem is, the hypervisor is not documented all that well. And any individual that got a hardmod, just gave up because they got what they needed, and didn't bother looking for a softmod.so why didnt you hack the 360 yourself? Obviously the software was pretty tight.
people are so cheap to spend a normally the price of a game on a modchip for convience and options, while stealing multiple $60 games , a logic i dont understand..