Hardware acer predator xb271hu vs asus pg279q

Inukami

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
108
Trophies
1
XP
210
Country
United States
can't decide between these two. i've seen a lot of issues in regards to blb with the asus when it first came out but i'm not sure if it's been fixed. which one would you say is a better buy?
 

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,798
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,824
Country
United States
It looks like the Asus ROG in every regard, just compared to the price difference between them. Why do you need a monitor that costs more than my entire computer, though?
 

Inukami

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
108
Trophies
1
XP
210
Country
United States
It looks like the Asus ROG in every regard, just compared to the price difference between them. Why do you need a monitor that costs more than my entire computer, though?

well i want to play in 1440p and something that's a bit higher than 60hz refresh rate and it has to be IPS. Oh yeah and i have an nvidia card(1080). The only monitors with a refresh rate above 60hz that are ips and 1440p are 144-165hz? I don't think even a 1080 can match its fps to 144-165hz so i would get tearing/stuttering which would mean i would need g-sync.
 
Last edited by Inukami,
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,798
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,824
Country
United States
well i want to play in 1440p and something that's a bit higher than 60hz refresh rate and it has to be IPS. Oh yeah and i have an nvidia card(1080). The only monitors with a refresh rate above 60hz that are ips and 1440p are 144-165hz? I don't think even a 1080 can play at 144-165hz so i would get tearing/stuttering which would mean i would need g-sync.
Fair enough. As I said, if you're willing to shell out the cash, I'd go for the Asus one
 

Armadillo

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Messages
4,389
Trophies
3
XP
5,847
Country
United Kingdom
I'd go with whichever is cheaper.

It's the same panel in both. QC on that panel is still shocking (dead pixels etc). Both Asus and Acer have also been complete trainwrecks with the QC on their high refresh IPS monitors. Both have awful RMAs, Asus will just give you someone else's return and Acer are just shit.

Both are great if you get a good one and a shitshow if you don't. So if you're going to run the risk, may as well be with the cheaper option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

Originality

Chibi-neko
Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,716
Trophies
1
Age
36
Location
London, UK
Website
metalix.deviantart.com
XP
1,914
Country
i just really wish amd could have come out with GPUs better than what the 400 series has to offer. Then i wouldn't have to pay a premium for gsync.
Supposedly they will come out with better, but they released the mid-ranged model first to appeal to as much of the market as possible before they push the specs for the niche market of enthusiast gamers. It's their new strategy instead of underwhelming compared to nVidia every year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Latest Switch 2 leak says it will have a LCD, not OLED, run most games 40fps max, and only be 1.5 tflops handheld, 3 tflops docked. That's less than the steamdeck at 1.71 handheld, 3.1 docked.
    +1
  • console @ console:
    Switch 2 LCD is about like TN type compare to old Nintendo Switch LCD before. Also games running on 40 FPS look not good for us and people. 60 FPS are best for normal everyday gaming. That's weird. I think should not buy Switch 2 because it like Switch 1.5 something like that. Little improve but not major improve. I think going to skip it.
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Yea that's just rumored but not sounding that impressive for a next gen upgrade. Of course Nintendo is very good at optimization of their games to play well, but for a $400+ 2025 console I expected a little better. Even a $299 2020 Xbox Series S has 4 tflops.
    +1
  • Anrei @ Anrei:
    I thought it was supposed to be on par with an xbox 1 in power, why is it running most things at 40fps lol
  • Anrei @ Anrei:
    in terms of power I thought it was a 2.0 compared to the switch man 40fps sounds whack is there poor optimisation or something?
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Just rumors/ leaks. We will find out in a few weeks. But yea prob way underpowered to save battery, for longer playtimes, like Switch 1 is.
    +2
  • Cranesbill @ Cranesbill:
    Ooo ooo switch 2 leaks are in :>
    +1
  • M @ Misaka_Mikoto_Fan:
    Could've used 50 FPS for the true PAL experience
  • Kirbydogs @ Kirbydogs:
    2 double parkers on opposite ends have created a traffic jam
  • Kirbydogs @ Kirbydogs:
    more specifically, people have been holding their horns non-stop for the past three minutes.
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    OIP.uesE-DOazRhQs40fTwiJSwHaDT

    Put on your daisy dukes, and start a car wash
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Sell hot dogs
    +2
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    I'd use lemuroid more often if games didnt look blurry even with the "sharp" filter on
  • Kirbydogs @ Kirbydogs:
    I honestly forgot GBAtemp has ads
  • Kirbydogs @ Kirbydogs:
    I wouldn't be surprised if the staff forgot too
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @Kirbydogs, most staff members are patrons so it's understandable
    +1
  • E @ evanft:
    Teraflops are not necessarily indicative of real world performance, especially when compared across different architectures. The Switch 2 will also be smaller/lighter than the Steam Deck so it's performance has to fit inside a much smaller thermal and power envelope. Using a 120hz VRR panel means 40 fps locks can be an option in handheld mode, which will be a noticeable upgrade over the current 30 fps standard on Switch 1. Games could also go uncapped and leverage VRR to keep things smooth.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Call me a filthy casual but I really don't notice the difference between the last few generations of consoles, and pushing specs just for the sake of bragging rights is really pointless.
    +4
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    With a bit of emulation upscale magic, I'm OK playing old games lol
    +1
  • MysticStarlight @ MysticStarlight:
    I still don't see the difference between PS4 and PS5 other than the loading times
    MysticStarlight @ MysticStarlight: I still don't see the difference between PS4 and PS5 other than the loading times