I'm not dismissing anything or harassing anyone. I'm just looking for an explanation which I have yet to get. My problem started when the devs came into the unofficial citra thread and called the build compiled by those in here shit. It was uncalled for. These guys haven't been saying Canary builds were crap. They just tweaked them a little for their own purposes. They didn't claim they were the original authors of said emu. They want no money or ask for no praise from the users. You want to know some developers who have the right to be pissed? That the PCSX2 devs. Their code is being used by lowlifes who are claiming it their work to make an Android emu, and asking for money. The PCSX2 devs should be mad as hell.
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet K1 using Tapatalk
I'm not dismissing anything or harassing anyone.
Yes you are and I've proved it to you.
When Devs are talking about issues they *experienced*, you're dismissing them because it does not fit your *picture* - quote "The official code is intact. The devs can keep developing it as usual. It hurts nothing"
And when Devs are talking about depleting incentive, your first reaction is harassment - quote "Is it praise or worship? Or maybe monetary?"
I'm just looking for an explanation which I have yet to get.
Either you're not taking Core Dev's words, or you do not have the proper background to understand an explanation.
But I still hope you get something from all the *test* related issues I mentioned at least?
It was uncalled for. These guys haven't been saying Canary builds were crap.
>>And calling builds shit
is not a give & take. Shitty builds - even some screwed up canary versions could be -
is judged at code level.
And what are current unofficial builds?
Codes that can't pass QA, unfinished at a "not for testing" level by other Devs, fix some games while broke others - but sometimes broke the game it intends to fix too (tick hack)
All sorts of code that leads to
unsustainable development.
And the path to get out of this mess is already mentioned by B3N30 - quote "Don't waist time on releasing hacks! Start doing proper RE and development"
They just tweaked them a little for their own purposes.
And in turn causing harms, which is not their purpose, but yes it exist.
They didn't claim they were the original authors of said emu.
Unrelated, not a topic here
They want no money or ask for no praise from the users.
I believe both Core Devs and unofficial builders all
just want a clean and smooth environment/community,
that when a new code is deployed/released,
issues can be found and track down correctly and efficiently.
Unofficial builds are currently going against it, even if it's probably not intended.
Reasons already mentioned by Core Devs pages ago - Diverged user pool / test samples,
Hacks that just hides problems but not solving them, while introducing new ones...
I don't know why you still keep your wrong mindset, or throw claims base on your own imaginations - when you're actually *trying get an explanation*.
What you claim you are and what you're doing are complete opposite.