BlueStar said:I don't mind people making amusing observations about the boxart, jokes about the title etc and they're more interesting to read than page after page of "Deleted: Pointless" "Deleted: Pointless". People asking questions over and over again in release threads is annoying if it's a half decent game but, come on, if it wasn't for people being incredulous about how many horse games there have been, laughing at the title or photoshopping the boxart most game threads would be completely empty. What do you expect to find in the release thread of Imagine Baby Fashion Designer? A video review? The meaning of life? A cure for cancer? The roadmap to peace in the middle east? or people saying "Jesus not another one" and pointing out that the hell-child on the front has a murderous glint in its eye?
funem said:I don't expect a post that basically says nothing at all "WTF" is not a post nor is "hahahahahahaha", laughing at something and making a point at what it is you are laughing at is ok. No I don't expect the cure for cancer or the meaning of life, get real, I never said that. What I expect I is what seems to be pointless posting, posts that say nothing in any way shape or form, just for the sake of a post, or even the repeated questions without having the thought or the common decency to read the thread first. People who also post and slag off the game because its a genre they think shouldn't be released, like the Dora games, without playing it or seeing if the game actually suits the audience it was created for, shows ignorance in my opinion as its games like these that pay for the development of other games. If its a crap game (*looks at the Fantastic 4 games), then say so. If its a good game that works for the target audience then that is fine. The game gets posted as released and before its even been looked at, loaded or even tried, you get a crap load of stupid ( and I mean stupid ) comments.
I don't mind a joke, I don't mind having a laugh, but the posts here are taking a slow slide for the worst. Its been picked up here before and the mods and so forth have commented and cracked down on it, but it looks like ( to me anyway ) its happening again.. all the GTA threads prove my point on this.
I have moderated websites before, its a thankless task but I would hate to see this site take a nose dive through the stupidity of others.
Sort of a "I do it because it can be done" mentality maybe?Barta said:I couldn't agree more. Why leave a comment when you have nothing to say?
RupeeClock said:The whole "Deleted: Pointless" thing really gets to me though, why edit the post and leave proof that somebody said something?
(Does the forum not support actually removing the posts or is it mod policy?)
lilsypha said:We refer to this as 'trashing' posts. Of course the posts can be deleted, but then there is no record of what was said. While a regular user is browsing a thread, they will see "Deleted: pointless", etc, but mods not only see that, we see the post that was trashed as well, as if it had never been removed.
Anyhow, at everyone who wants to know if this game is any good: No, not really. I think that's been gathered by the comments already.
QUOTE said:The whole "Deleted: Pointless" thing really gets to me though, why edit the post and leave proof that somebody said something?
To ensure that the poster is aware of why their post has been trashed. By deleting it they wouldn't learn and do it again. It can also be there for future reference (e.g. if someone's spammed multiple times on the forums).
QUOTEBut I have to say that this really seems wrong:
http://gbatemp.net/index.php?s=&showto...t&p=1819407
Moderators leaving their mark on users, with their own name, it's demeaning.
Just make a batch file that saysZyenet said:Not something I expected to see...why exactly? What's next..."Writing Trojans for Dummies"?
No.. "Game development for dummies" and then released by EA (like this one).Zyenet said:Not something I expected to see...why exactly? What's next..."Writing Trojans for Dummies"?
Actually ur not covering card games wells, as the 101 solitaire games or whatever it was called did them and alot more better than the paltry few in 42 all time classics...RupeeClock said:Solitaire? Sudoku? Chess?
I bet they don't measure up to 42 all time classics or Brain Age sudoku.