- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 7,233
- Reaction score
- 5,707
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- Sacramento, California
- Website
- lazerlight.x10.mx
- XP
- 9,470
- Country
Figures that the loons would jump into whataboutisms. It's their only way to validate what Trump is doing right now. "But Obama without authorization bombed...." And who actually agreed that it was a good or even necessary thing? If anything, pointing him out for it being bad would give reason to point out Trump for doing it too, but y'all are defending Trump..... It's just like with basically defending Trump by trying to point at the Clintons with the Epstein Files, when normal folk want them ALL to be prosecuted.
Perhaps he had a good reason for bombing them? That they are a threat to neighboring countries and in time, America? The thing is, Trump's recent speech contradicts the assessment done last year in how Iran is as far as around a decade away from having anything of that nature. But what do you expect from Trump when he literally ripped up an existing agreement with Iran in his first term? Or how he claimed he "obliterated" existing Iran nuclear facilities, which if anything, would go against the idea that Iran could be a threat to have them bombed again.....
The man that claimed he would not start wars........ starts wars......
Perhaps he had a good reason for bombing them? That they are a threat to neighboring countries and in time, America? The thing is, Trump's recent speech contradicts the assessment done last year in how Iran is as far as around a decade away from having anything of that nature. But what do you expect from Trump when he literally ripped up an existing agreement with Iran in his first term? Or how he claimed he "obliterated" existing Iran nuclear facilities, which if anything, would go against the idea that Iran could be a threat to have them bombed again.....
The man that claimed he would not start wars........ starts wars......
Last edited by DiscostewSM,
