Palworld developer responds to Nintendo's lawsuit, claims they don't know which patents are being infringed upon

apps.45256.13654268679289325.01507a26-10bf-4e61-a168-378f3da728c1.jpeg

Late yesterday, Nintendo and The Pokemon Company filed a lawsuit against Pocketpair, the developer of the monster-collecting open-world game Palworld, alleging it infringed upon their patents. Initial reports did not specify which patents were being infringed upon, and it turns out the defendants in the case aren't sure either.

Pocketpair issued a public response to the lawsuit this morning, claiming that they are "unaware of the specific patents [they] are accused of infringing upon," and "have not been notified of such details." They have begun "investigations into the claims of patent infringement," and while they will continue working on Palworld, they regret that they "will be forced to allocate significant time to matters unrelated to game development due to this lawsuit." More than that, they believe they have an opportunity to "ensure that indie game developers are not hindered or discouraged from pursuing their creative ideas" and plan to do what they can in pursuit of that goal.

:arrow: Source
 

TVL

#|
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
581
Trophies
3
Location
World -1
XP
2,422
Country
Sweden
I would like to hear about the patents they got. You can't patent a game idea. If so Nintendo could sue a LOT of game studios for "reskinning" Super Mario Bros, making Zelda-clones, copying Metroid etc.

But you can have patents for insane BS. Sega owned the patent to direct the player with an arrow in a racing game, like they have in Crazy Taxi. So maybe it's something like that, Nintendo might have the patent for keeping your monsters in an index. Naughty Dog also has a patent for a programming algorithm, Andy Gavin talks about it in an interview with Ars Technica, which I didn't think was possible, but appearantly it is (IMO disgusting).

Patents like that should not be granted, the ones asking should be publicly ridiculed for at least a year instead. Same with studios thinking they own a word, how Notch's game he was working on Scrolls infringed on The Elder Scrolls or some BS and the publishers of Candy Crush tried to hinder people from using Saga in their game title (something like that).

It will be interesting to hear an update. If you are a big company you could just kill a smaller company by keeping them in court until they go bankrupt, like Sony did with Lik-Sang and the guys that made Bleem.
 

samcambolt270

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
1,176
Trophies
0
XP
3,028
Country
United States
lol this shit again, get some new material XD Discussing ai does not magically bring into question the authenticity of things you make and its literally irrelevant to whether palworld copied pokemon designs. Somehow even Ai is more original than you, considering how many times this has been regurgitated.
 

smilodon

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
414
Trophies
1
XP
3,140
Country
France
lol this shit again, get some new material XD Discussing ai does not magically bring into question the authenticity of things you make and its literally irrelevant to whether palworld copied pokemon designs. Somehow even Ai is more original than you, considering how many times this has been regurgitated.
It is irrelevant because... you decided so? Ok?
 

samcambolt270

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
1,176
Trophies
0
XP
3,028
Country
United States
It is irrelevant because... you decided so? Ok?
it's relevant because you say so? No, it literally isn't. I can discuss ai as much as I want and it isn't magically evidence that something completely unrelated is a copy. It isn't proof they used ai and it isn't prove they copied designs. You're the one with the burden of proof here, prove that discussing ai on twitter makes some random thing you made a copy. Do it. It's not relevant!
 

dalmatian666

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2024
Messages
230
Trophies
0
Age
39
XP
309
Country
Australia
This lawsuit proves to me why it's perfectly ok even good to pirate nintendos games. If you want the pokemon dollars from pc gamers, put your shit on pc then. I'm not buying a handheld equivalent to a 2013 mobile phone when i can play them in 5k 60fps on pc. Sony, Microsoft, everyone has figured out it makes sense to put their games on pc these days, everyone except your stubborn ass. I guarantee you would sell 5 mil plus even at $70 for Super Mario Odyssey, a 7 year old game off steam today if you got off your high horse. Hell, id probably buy it myself. But as it is, Nintendo go fark yourself, and i hope your lawsuit burns in the same hole as the Wii U digital store
 

AkiraKurusu

Stratospheric Thunder!
Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2019
Messages
1,391
Trophies
2
Age
26
Location
Northwood, Sydney
XP
4,244
Country
Australia
From memory, Nintendo tried to copyright the unique VCR-style jumpscares in Eternal Darkness, which is partly why we haven't seen another game like it since (along with VCRs going extinct in the home)

So I'm not surprised by this, at all.

I dont know which side to go upon, but considering their usual reputation, I'll continue to watch the fans of Nintendo hate upon them. It's almost like comfort food at this point
I'm generally a Nintendo fan...but not a diehard one by any means. I've been rather critical of their recent Pokémon and Legend of Zelda releases, not to mention Paper Mario.
You won't be getting any comfort food outta me, is what I'm saying.
 

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Entropy Trap
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
28,620
Trophies
6
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
42,012
Country
Antarctica
It is irrelevant because... you decided so? Ok?
It's irrelevant because it has nothing to do with Palworld. They didn't use AI to make the Pals, there's literally no point in bringing up that tweet.
 

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Entropy Trap
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
28,620
Trophies
6
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
42,012
Country
Antarctica
I really hope that Nintendo doesn't win this because it would set a dangerous precedent in the legal world of video game and being able to patent Mechanics would drastically cut creativity and even set up lawsuits for many games AAA or Indie.
Let's not beat around the bush, this would only benefit AAA companies. Copyright and patents very rarely help the little man, as large companies have the means to abuse the system. Simply put, letting them have this power will only harm indie games.
 

SonowRaevius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2013
Messages
457
Trophies
1
Age
34
XP
3,367
Country
United States
Let's not beat around the bush, this would only benefit AAA companies. Copyright and patents very rarely help the little man, as large companies have the means to abuse the system. Simply put, letting them have this power will only harm indie games.
That is what I meant, sorry if I phrased it oddly.
 

dalmatian666

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2024
Messages
230
Trophies
0
Age
39
XP
309
Country
Australia
Nintendo know this won't go to court even though they will/would be more than willing to take it that far. Reason being they are using the same method they used against yuzu, citra and other people who have made passion projects based on their IPs. They know the palworld devs dont have the money to defend themselves in court against Nintendo, so Nintendo are suing them knowing that palworlds devs will give in and pay them a settlement/delist the game or both. Thats the difference between SEGA and them. Fans make Sonic Mania, SEGA are impressed and hire them to release it as a legit canon title in their series of games. Nintendo just sue the shit out of these people, bankrupt them and or get them sent to jail. If i didnt already say it before, fuck Nintendo and anyone who defends these scummy copyright practices they engage in
 

Spider_Man

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
3,970
Trophies
0
Age
38
XP
5,348
Country
United States
About time. I mean, it was blatantly obvious.
What was?

How Crash Team Racing is pretty much Mario Kart?

Unless their is an exact identical likeness of anything nintendo..... then nintendo can just suck it.

The only thing here that gets away ripping off identical shit over and over is nintendo.
 

smilodon

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
414
Trophies
1
XP
3,140
Country
France
It's irrelevant because it has nothing to do with Palworld. They didn't use AI to make the Pals, there's literally no point in bringing up that tweet.
Yeah once again you just decide to ignore things for no clear reason. If you can't see why this post of the Pocket Pair CEO has something to do with Pal World I don't think it is worth having a discussion with you.
 

Snintendog

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
132
Trophies
0
XP
798
Country
United States
Yeah once again you just decide to ignore things for no clear reason. If you can't see why this post of the Pocket Pair CEO has something to do with Pal World I don't think it is worth having a discussion with you.
Reading Comprehension ZERO. Keep moving the goal posts.
1. Patent Infringement not Copywrong
2. AI Debunked as IGN misinformation
3. Patent Infringement is of "Throwing an ITEM to capture a BEAST. As a Gameplay mechanic in the 3rd Person." Craftopia Predates Legends Arceus even showing it being done by 4 years This is a case of BLATANT PATENT FRAUD. By definition Since Pocket pair was the first to the punch but didn't file the patent in japan it goes Public domain after 1 year post implementation. Nintendo just Tried to claim something in the Public DOMAIN. And EVEN IF nintendo was first to its punch they filed the Patent outside of that 12 month leeway period of Legends Arceus (People point to an unknown source stating march 2023 meanwhile Justia states may2024) so its a double level of PATENT FRAUD This goes for the storage box, IVs, Rideable Mounts, Flying mounts, Hybrid Mounts, Quickswap mounts, EVs, ETC. The Fact Craftopia isn't the first game to the punch is even more Damning since MULTIPLE games In and out of Japan have ALL of these gameplay through out gamings LONG years makes these Patents a possible Class action for Multiple companies against nintendo. The Situation Keep getting worse for the case for nintendo the more i look into JP law and other games with mechanics before this. So far Depending on the Patent TPC and Nintedo use They will draw ire from
Square Enix
Capcom
Sega(+Atlus)
Konami
Bandai Namco
Falcom
Sony
Fromsoft
An assortment of Indie Devs (Though the lawsuit alone would have drawn their ire legally they can act on it now.)
And that is JUST the Gaming based Companies. Many others have abided on the honor system on pokemon during its release for Copy Wrong this includes
Tatsunoko
Toei
4. Your being a douche
 

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Entropy Trap
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
28,620
Trophies
6
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
42,012
Country
Antarctica
Yeah once again you just decide to ignore things for no clear reason. If you can't see why this post of the Pocket Pair CEO has something to do with Pal World I don't think it is worth having a discussion with you.
You haven’t explained shit. You literally posted a tweet that has nothing to do with Palworld. Maybe consider actually explaining the point to your post and how it relates to Palworld and this lawsuit
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: @SylverReZ, @salazarcosplay Atleast it seems he got better +1