This also stop alot of peopl
i guess practice safe sex
-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Roe V Wade has been repealed
- Thread starter Noctosphere
- Start date
- Views 79,643
- Replies 2,460
- Likes 4
- Status
Not if contraception is struck down, like Clarence Thomas plans to do.
This news shows why Canada and Europe keeps getting better than USA by just doing nothing.
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2013
- Messages
- 17,841
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- The Lands Between
- Website
- gbatemp.net
- XP
- 8,827
- Country
And the reason they're permitted to care about the freedom to own guns is because they're all spineless bootlickers. They'd never bite the kleptocratic hand that feeds them, even if it only feeds them the tiniest of table scraps. They claim to hate big government, but if a Republican is in charge, they'll gladly accept and submit to any amount of oppression; they've been programmed to hate the "other" more than they like themselves. 1% chance they try to overthrow the government when/if it's actually necessary, 99% chance they just shoot up a minority neighborhood instead when the anger boils over and they misplace blame for the state of their lives. Doesn't bother our oligarchs any, and least of all the conservative leadership.as i said, conservatives don't hate freedom
They are ALL IN FAVOR for guns
/Rant
What about rape?
Oh wait. I forget that only happens in Republican fantasies.
Leave it to the good old USA to leave the bar on the floor.
Unlike you, illiterate, I have. And considering how biased the SCOTUS is, it doesn't matter whether the precedent has legal basis or not - they'll overturn it out of spite.
Did you read Thomas' concurring opinion? He thinks cases relating to contraception, sodomy laws, same-sex marriage, etc. should be relitigated.
So, I shouldn't have a right to do what I want with my own body if I'm interrupting a "physiological process"?
- This will always boil down to the moral issue. If people truly feel abortion = murder, then of course they're going to want the law to be consistent. Murder is bad.
- That then leads to a big domino effect on both sides. If abortion = murder, then the implications of sex change completely. I think it's all contingent on that. People leaning left generally feel this is oppressive; people leaning right feel this is as simple as "murder bad - plz ban"
- We all have to concede that we don't know when personhood truly begins - it's still heavily debated among scientists. It's worth talking about, but none of us have the resources to convince the other side. It's still a philosophical point unless Science can get closer to something we can agree on.
- This issue is a giant, juicy apple for politicians. It being divisive is what gives it so much power. There's a reason you're hearing about abortion every election cycle. I just hope more and more people can see it for what it is, politically.
- Many users on here are talking about this being a slippery slope, where this sets a precedence for more left or right leaning policies on each side of the debate. While you're 100% correct, that holds potentially true for every law, left or right. I feel that makes it a moot point. I see commentators mention this talking point on the left and right a lot. It's the same logic used by anti-maskers.
Somehow it's a choice to become pregnant but to STOP being pregnant isn't...
@Valwinz
From the mouth of the bastard himself. Guess we'll find condoms on the black market next to assault rifles soon, huh?
Y'all won't be happy until everyone's rights are taken away, won't you?
From the mouth of the bastard himself. Guess we'll find condoms on the black market next to assault rifles soon, huh?
Y'all won't be happy until everyone's rights are taken away, won't you?
So, by real murderers then. Of actual, real people, not embryo cells.
I completely agree. That's why I think it's more effective to use arguments that can't be thrown back at us. I think the slippery slope fallacy gives others ammunition.
The same can be said about literally all crimes, they will continue to happen regardless of the law, so as they will just continue to happen, should we then do nothing about them?
How many abortions were carried out because of rape? not even 1%. You cant argue your general cause using exceptions
No, you should not have a right to end someone else right to life
im the sickest most deprave fucker you could meet and even I know safe sex and I think the consequences
- Status
- No one is chatting at the moment.
