Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

  • Thread starter Thread starter yusuo
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 554,771
  • Replies Replies 7,444
  • Likes Likes 45
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here
Status
Not open for further replies.
I heard this live on the air. It was... kind of sad.

I can't imagine what it'd be like to have that moment of realization that you've been strung along for 4+ years all for nothing.

I also can't imagine how so many people will never have that realization.
I feel for their pain but its needed to get people to really realize how they got swindled and I painfully and regrettably hope it will happen to much more of the Republican Party.
 
Alright, so stop using "both acts are wrong" as an excuse to justify the Capitol riots and ignore the blatant disregard for our democracy that Trump has demonstrated.
I'm not justifying anything - I am pointing out hypocrisy where I see it. I've started this conversation saying that storming the Capitol was idiotic and wrong, and maintain that opinion. We should be against any extreme behaviours like this across the board, not just when it's politically expedient.
 
Its going to be slow and long time to get Normal Americans to realized they been played by Republican leaders.. The others will have a harder time to face White nationalist tendencies
4t49mj.jpg
 
I'm not justifying anything - I am pointing out hypocrisy where I see it. I've started this conversation saying that storming the Capitol was idiotic and wrong, and maintain that opinion. We should be against any behaviours like this across the board, not just when it's politically expedient.
BLM protests wouldn't have any chance of turning violent if systemic racism and police brutality were tackled so that they didn't need to occur. How about we tackle things from that angle? And before you say it, the Capitol rioters did get their version of that angle- basically every corner of the election was scrutinized and determined to be devoid of any tampering anywhere near major enough to do anything to the actual results- but they didn't like that answer.
 
I'm not justifying anything - I am pointing out hypocrisy where I see it. I've started this conversation saying that storming the Capitol was idiotic and wrong, and maintain that opinion. We should be against any extreme behaviours like this across the board, not just when it's politically expedient.

And I won't disagree with a single thing you said in this quote.

My point stands though, that while yes, rioting is wrong, I can VERY MUCH sympathize with riots that, when started by the group initiating the peaceful protests, are happening because people are tired of being shot and killed just because they've got more melanin than I do.

I have no sympathy for anything that happens to the dumbasses that staged an armed invasion of the nation's capitol because they couldn't convince enough of their own people to vote in the fucking election.
 
BLM protests wouldn't have any chance of turning violent if systemic racism and police brutality were tackled so that they didn't need to occur. How about we tackle things from that angle? And before you say it, the Capitol rioters did get their version of that angle- basically every corner of the election was scrutinized and determined to be devoid of any tampering anywhere near major enough to do anything to the actual results- but they didn't like that answer.
As did the BLM protesters - Trump himself signed an executive order pushing for sweeping police reform in the wake of George Floyd's death. If you want to look further back than that, we'd have to start arguing statistics which go way beyond the scope of the thread - long story short, racial bias in policing is a controversial issue and year after year we see studies that fail to detect any. My point isn't that the BLM movement didn't have a reason to protest - the police does kill people, a lot, regardless of whether we look at white or black victims, and that's a big problem. I encourage them to exercise their first amendment right. Did they have incentives to loot Targets though? I don't think so. There's no excuse for rioting, looting, violence, arson or storming federal buildings. This *should* be uncontroversial, but we're all bending backwards to find excuses why "this particular case is different". No, it isn't - a small minority following clause X did Y, and we should disown them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sicklyboy
As did the BLM protesters - Trump himself signed an executive order pushing for sweeping police reform in the wake of George Floyd's death. If you want to look further back than that, we'd have to start arguing statistics which go way beyond the scope of the thread - long story short, racial bias in policing is a controversial issue and year after year we see studies that fail to detect any. My point isn't that the BLM movement didn't have a reason to protest - the police does kill people, a lot, regardless of whether we look at white or black victims, and that's a big problem. I encourage them to exercise their first amendment right. Did they have incentives to loot Targets though? I don't think so. There's no excuse for rioting, looting, violence, arson or storming federal buildings. This *should* be uncontroversial, but we're all bending backwards to find excuses why "this particular case is different". No, it isn't - a small minority following clause X did Y, and we should disown them.

mmmm, I would second guess that one chief.
Since uh, Police has a history...
And it's not exactly good.
Unless your telling me you can beat all 23 sources he provided.
 

mmmm, I would second guess that one chief.
Since uh, Police has a history...
And it's not exactly good.
Unless your telling me you can beat all 23 sources he provided.
Most certainly not in this thread since it would be entirely off-topic. The issue has been extensively studied and the statistics simply fail to show any significant, widespread racial bias in policing. In fact, some showed that, paradoxically, white suspects were more likely to be shot dead while black suspects were more likely to face excessive physical force instead. Unfortunately studies that support or disprove the idea of racial bias in policing can't be trusted, they're not representative since there's really no nation-wide system or database that tracks instances of police shootings/use of excessive force - researchers have to rely on small sample sizes from select few precincts which makes it difficult to determine how widespread the issue really is. The total numbers aren't even the point here - the point is that there are deeper underlying issues which lead to those fatal arrests, and we're missing the forest for the trees by focusing on race rather than resolving decades-long problems with insufficient training and the over-militarisation of the police. No amount of racial sensitivity seminars will stop them from using military gear if we keep giving them military gear. They're trained to be enforcers, so that's what they're doing, and that's a problem. You'd think they wouldn't need armored carriers, but they have those and then some, mostly due to the government offloading their military surplus. It's a huge mess, but personally I think it has less to do with the specter of "white supremacy in police departments" and more with a growing disconnect between the police and the people they're supposed to protect and serve.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum