Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

[djpannda]

Any sources to back that up?

Also, I keep getting your Leaders mixed up as you are all commies. I guess we are talking about Biden here:
Biden asks for money for presidential transition, told to go to OnlyFans instead

Asking for donations to cheat and steal this election wasn't enough, he had to ask his sheep (or uninformed voters as they're usually called) to tighten their belts more to pay for transition money during a pandemic when Pedocrat states/cities are forcing small businesses to stay closed when there is already a transition fund, but greedy people are also very impatient (well, considering Biden is on borrowed time, I guess I can understand a little).

wait? how much have you donated to keep Trump president.... $200million plus... oh ok that worked great .. im sure hell be president for a 2nd term ... keep giving money that will work

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Any sources to back that up?

Also, I keep getting your Leaders mixed up as you are all commies.

Donald J. Trump Pays Court-Ordered $2 Million For Illegally Using Trump Foundation Funds
Ouch Your lack of knowledge post did not age well for that those 2 hours

 

[kingaz]

Yes. And the fact that it was presented as a response to something specific is the context, which you decided to reject.



False.



That has nothing to do with the president. Being a coward your perogative. Amanda saying stupid things and being a hypocrite is her perogative. So if those things are insulting to you, then maybe you would consider the behaviors, themselves, to be the infractions.





Honesty would look good on you, imo.

There you go again, misquoting things to change the meaning (I was referring to Silent_Gunner's quote, not AmandaRose's), deflecting, insulting, and pretending that you haven't been making a fool of yourself. I can see why you identify with the president, given your inability to engage honestly with others or admit to your own behavior. Just like Trump pretends that he's brilliant and loved and that evil people are out to "steal" the election, you deny all reality to convince yourself that you cannot possibly be wrong, and that everyone else is out to get you.

 

[Driving_duck]

Any sources to back that up?

Also, I keep getting your Leaders mixed up as you are all commies. I guess we are talking about Biden here:
Biden asks for money for presidential transition, told to go to OnlyFans instead

Asking for donations to cheat and steal this election wasn't enough, he had to ask his sheep (or uninformed voters as they're usually called) to tighten their belts more to pay for transition money during a pandemic when Pedocrat states/cities are forcing small businesses to stay closed when there is already a transition fund, but greedy people are also very impatient (well, considering Biden is on borrowed time, I guess I can understand a little).

Jesus your blind, your are a sheep. This is all false, like, give something else other then this. Eitherway, your probarly gonna get banned because of left mods in here, so reccomend you shut your brainwashed mouth to yourself.

 

[djpannda]

Dominion threatens defamation lawsuit over Sidney Powell's election conspiracy theories: 'You are not entitled to your own facts'

• "Dominion has never provided machines or any of its software or technology to Venezuela, nor has it ever participated in any elections to Venezuela," the letter, obtained by Insider, said. "It did not receive $400 million from the Chinese in the weeks before the 2020 election. It has no ties to the Chinese government, the Venezuelan government, George Soros, Bigfoot, or the Loch Ness Monster."

lolol it seems like the Dominion lawyer is on Gbatemp and follows me lolol

 

[tabzer]

How convenient that they list everyone except Hugo Chavez and the Clinton Foundation.

 

[djpannda]

How convenient that they list everyone except Hugo Chavez and the Clinton Foundation.

and Jesus, Budda, Hitler, and Ghandi... yup .... Tabzer is right ...Budda stole The Election

 

[morvoran]

To further celebrate Joe Biden's stolen "victory" over Trump, I found this montage of some of his most inspiring quotes. I'm sure a lot of you would have voted for Joe a 5th or 6th time the morning after election day if you were aware of these. Some, I'm sure, were already aware and this is the reason for voting. I'm sure you were thinking, "I don't want to live in an urban jungle, either." Well, chances are, he will end Trump's prison reform bill (look it up as I'm 99% positive you aren't aware of it) and reissue his 1994 crime bill as a 2021 crime EO. (I'd say just wait and see, but he won't ever get the chance.)

Start the video at 2:12 if it doesn't already:

 

[djpannda]

To further celebrate Joe Biden's stolen "victory" over Trump, I found this montage of some of his most inspiring quotes. I'm sure a lot of you would have voted for Joe a 5th or 6th time the morning after election day if you were aware of these. Some, I'm sure, were already aware and this is the reason for voting. I'm sure you were thinking, "I don't want to live in an urban jungle, either." Well, chances are, he will end Trump's prison reform bill (look it up as I'm 99% positive you aren't aware of it) and reissue his 1994 crime bill as a 2021 crime EO. (I'd say just wait and see, but he won't ever get the chance.)

Start the video at 2:12 if it doesn't already:

Im glad to see you have accepted the election and acknowledge your new president And in case you were not embarrassed enough

Any sources to back that up?

Also, I keep getting your Leaders mixed up as you are all commies.

Donald J. Trump Pays Court-Ordered $2 Million For Illegally Using Trump Foundation Funds

 

[morvoran]

Yeah, I suppose there are those who fall for Chinese-funded disinformation campaigns such as the Epoch Times. I'm betting you're among them. Me, not so much.

You know there are other sources of news that aren't the Epoch Times, which is a non-biased news channel. You are just confused as they are not just Pedocrat shills.

 

[Xzi]

the Epoch Times, which is a non-biased news channel

LMAO okay Xinnie the Pooh's bitchboy.

 

[morvoran]

LMAO okay Xinnie the Pooh's bitchboy.

Just like a pedocrat to accuse a Trumpican of doing/being what they do/are.

Ok, I was confused about WTF you were talking about, so I had to look this up.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/nbc-news-gets-its-facts-about-the-epoch-times-wrong-again_3558902.html

(I'll take a play out of your side's book.) See here??? The Epoch Times says you are wrong and here's my proof. Try again, Commie.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Turns out that the SCOTUS denied to hear Texas' case against the battleground states due to the fact that the CCP got to John Roberts and made him violently yell at the other justices to not take that case. Such a shame that anybody can be bought or blackmailed and lose all their values/morals.

It is being reported as him and the other soy loving liberal justices feared antifa rioting:
Report: SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts Folded on Texas Election Fraud Case Due to Fear of ANTIFA Pushback


For the brainlets on here who have a hard time reading, here is a video that should help explain the situation for you:

 

[Deleted User]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/nbc-news-gets-its-facts-about-the-epoch-times-wrong-again_3558902.html

(I'll take a play out of your side's book.) See here??? The Epoch Times says you are wrong and here's my proof. Try again, Commie.

I'm not sure @Xzi is a commie (genuinely speaking) You guys conflate commies, socialists, and liberals so often that I honestly am unable to take you seriously. You just screech and call in the boogie man for stuff you hate. And even then. as long as he's not a Stalinist. Why would it even matter. (which I highly doubt. most common supporters of communism in the states are anarcho-communist)
now, on to the part you conveniently leave out.
The part that says your website is fake news, and that often our sources are factual.

so here we go again. reporting is mixed. And also, promotes propaganda and conspiracy theories. Go, figure.
Can't you tell I'm bored doing this?

Oh and regarding nbc, since that's what the epoch times was trashing on

 

[Ottoclav]

Still, ~36 days left until inauguration. Plenty of time to take out a loan and place another bet or two. Who knows, you could experience so much winning that even Trump himself would be in awe.

And 20 more days until the Electoral College Ballots are counted. We might get another 2016 situation on our hands. It'll be a great way to start up 2021, the second year of the world getting crapped on.

 

[tabzer]

There you go again, misquoting things to change the meaning

I know I was. I thought the context makes it obvious. I'm sorry for making fun of you and did not mean to hurt your feelings.

 

[tabzer]

I'm not sure @Xzi is a commie (genuinely speaking) You guys conflate commies, socialists, and liberals so often that I honestly am unable to take you seriously. You just screech and call in the boogie man for stuff you hate. And even then. as long as he's not a Stalinist. Why would it even matter. (which I highly doubt. most common supporters of communism in the states are anarcho-communist)
now, on to the part you conveniently leave out.
The part that says your website is fake news, and that often our sources are factual.
View attachment 238553
so here we go again. reporting is mixed. And also, promotes propaganda and conspiracy theories. Go, figure.
Can't you tell I'm bored doing this?

Oh and regarding nbc, since that's what the epoch times was trashing on
View attachment 238554

The use of fact-checking websites to validate personal bias is evidently already problematic.

There used to be fact checkers--it was called the free press. Now that news has become "media" and has been monopolized by oligarchical groups of people, it's safe to say that there is no free press; only a competition in controlling narrative. These fact checking websites are just another superficial layer of "the news", created only for leveraging the image of credibility under false pretenses. They have already become meme-ish in the prevalent use of infographics without citing sources (as your post is doing). They hide bias by using unverifiable and arbitrary scales of honesty and validate them with anecdotes. It is intellectually dishonest to be complacent in the reliance on fact-checking websites.

There is no clear governing model to determine the scale of honesty of news organizations as many undefined variables exist. Is one media source, that regularly and unfairly criticizes a political party, more dishonest than a mega-news corp that publishes a single grand hoax that, perhaps intentionally, crashes the economy? Also, how is it that some things are "debunked" because of witness testimony, while witness testimony is considered hearsay in debunking others? If there isn't consistency in fact check to fact check--it's unreliable and evidently biased.

 

[djpannda]

Report: Kushner helped create shell company that paid family members and spent $617 million in campaign funds
Damning report from Business Insider: Trump’s son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner helped create a shell company that secretly paid the Trump family and spent more than half of the campaign $1.26 billion war chest, according to sources who revealed the operation to the publication.

The shell company – American Made Media Consultants Corporation and American Made Media Consultants LLC – was able to skirt legal disclosures and avoid scrutiny from campaign finance regulators.

From January 2019 through the middle of November 2020, after the presidential election, Trump’s campaign and PAC spent more than $600 million through the company.

oops I guess it slipped out
You know what that Means!!!

 

[Deleted User]

The use of fact-checking websites to validate personal bias is evidently already problematic.

There used to be fact checkers--it was called the free press. Now that news has become "media" and has been monopolized by oligarchical groups of people, it's safe to say that there is no free press; only a competition in controlling narrative. These fact checking websites are just another superficial layer of "the news", created only for leveraging the image of credibility under false pretenses. They have already become meme-ish in the prevalent use of infographics without citing sources (as your post is doing). They hide bias by using unverifiable and arbitrary scales of honesty and validate them with anecdotes. It is intellectually dishonest to be complacent in the reliance on fact-checking websites.

There is no clear governing model to determine the scale of honesty of news organizations as many undefined variables exist. Is one media source, that regularly and unfairly criticizes a political party, more dishonest than a mega-news corp that publishes a single grand hoax that, perhaps intentionally, crashes the economy? Also, how is it that some things are "debunked" because of witness testimony, while witness testimony is considered hearsay in debunking others? If there isn't consistency in fact check to fact check--it's unreliable and evidently biased.

and websites that publish shit like this:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/super...ditation-dr-dean-radin-discusses_2157904.html
Make me question them entirely.
Yeah let's just go talk about psi on a news website I'm supposed to apparently take seriously.
Oh, and regarding to not citing source in your claim.

they point directly to some of the shit that makes them questionable.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Oh, and also regarding to your argument that the media controls everything therefore no news is trustworthy.
Considering share holders are involved, you would think that publishing fake stories, or mostly false information would get you in trouble with investors, especially if people where to find out.
Which people often do. It takes a lot for people stay quiet. One peeps and get the whole crowd talking.
Should you blindly trust? No, that's retarded, never for small scale, never for large scale.

 

[White_Raven_X]

Just like a pedocrat to accuse a Trumpican of doing/being what they do/are.

Ok, I was confused about WTF you were talking about, so I had to look this up.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/nbc-news-gets-its-facts-about-the-epoch-times-wrong-again_3558902.html

(I'll take a play out of your side's book.) See here??? The Epoch Times says you are wrong and here's my proof. Try again, Commie.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Turns out that the SCOTUS denied to hear Texas' case against the battleground states due to the fact that the CCP got to John Roberts and made him violently yell at the other justices to not take that case. Such a shame that anybody can be bought or blackmailed and lose all their values/morals.

It is being reported as him and the other soy loving liberal justices feared antifa rioting:
Report: SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts Folded on Texas Election Fraud Case Due to Fear of ANTIFA Pushback


For the brainlets on here who have a hard time reading, here is a video that should help explain the situation for you:

That video is pretty funny. Thanks for sharing that.

 

[tabzer]

Yeah let's just go talk about psi on a news website I'm supposed to apparently take seriously.

You can take it however seriously you want. They make articles that pander to their base, as do all publications. If one of their stories is being used, you can check their sources. But then you have articles that claim fact, and they don't reveal their source. Sometimes it's an anonymous source. That's a red flag.

Considering share holders are involved, you would think that publishing fake stories, or mostly false information would get you in trouble with investors, especially if people where to find out.

That's not reliable. Financial incentive does not translate into honest news. Pandering to their base usually translates to financial stability. If their base likes the gaslighting, the overdramatic interpretation of facts, or even fantasy--that can equal sales.

Oh, and regarding to not citing source in your claim.

Lol, sorry. I was referring to the fact that you weren't even putting up your factchecker's website/url with your infographics. I know what it is, so you don't have to tell me.

 

[Deleted User]

You can take it however seriously you want. They make articles that pander to their base, as do all publications.

So their base is about pseudo science and conspiracy theories?
Thanks for already confirming what I was already saying.