Can you reword that in a way that I can understand what you are saying? PoS is an alternative to PoW which doesn't require the bulk of the hardware and electricity to sustain it. With all currencies, the more you have, the more you are worth. That is the concept of "wealth".
No, the more you have the more you are likely to gain in the future. But without any element of chance, or 'circumstantial chance', or structural risk possible.
As in ever possible. From the first minute on the system is crafted.
Its as if someone looked at BTC and said, we dont like the romanticism, of someone finding 'gold' by chance, we think mining should be owned by the early big investors from here to eternity. The more you have, the more you gain. And this should prevent you from going against the system at 51% ownership of miners. We give you the full path to monopoly - from the first second on - without any of the romanticism, of also having chance in there.
We dont detest 51% ownership of verification, we long for it happening.
When starting such a currency you are basically drawing in the big players (in the field) at the start, and then fucking over all newcomers for eternity.
This has nothing to do with the 'decentralized' 'we reward neckbeards' model.
But then arguably no crypto currency after BTC (that will ever be of any importance) does. Which might be another unique selling point for BTC. It was the max divested one in the beginning. It became centralized, when professionals took over.
With Proof of stake, its licking the big players balls from the beginning. (How fast is the development rate on custom silicon?)
If thats the case (and everyone is trying to pull the big players in in the beginning, and then giving them advantage for life) - Cryptocurrency that doesnt lend itself well for custom silicon mining, would play a more and more diminishing role compared to all others. Do you know - is that the case?
For the single miner - this essentially means he opens up app. He gets their rate. He mines. He never gets a leg up. He never gets a raise. He never gets to compete. Distribution of 'stake' is decided in the beginning - especially with 'luring big players in' in mind. You give them a guarantee, that the only thing that matters is - what they have put in, and that they stay loyal.
But again, I dont think, that this is so much different with PoW (as it looks currently) either.
So lets see Cryptocoins as a scheme to draw in big investment in the beginning, and then perpetually draw in more and more suckers. Tell them what they are creating is the new gold - because its good for not much else. Endgame pump and dump.
And shed all the illusions of even roughly 'equal chance' in the beginning, just for a mere promise, that verification scales better in the end, and you are the currency that can become a widespread payment solution.
You know - facebook has it right.
Just sidestep that. Just say in the beginning, these are the 25 companies that will matter. Peg it to USD, so you solve the hyper inflation (and the price stability) issue. (But to allow to modify 'what it is' - in circulation.) Then do what you want, and be more competitive on every front.
edit: Basically this:
https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/6d1mca/proof_of_stake_leads_to_centralization_with_worse/