When you take someone down, based on their ideas, even if said ideas are harmful, you dont get them to change, you get them to hide, which makes getting them to change harder.I really think it should be ok to ban someone just for being a White Nationalist or a Neo-Nazi.
When you take someone down, based on their ideas, even if said ideas are harmful, you dont get them to change, you get them to hide, which makes getting them to change harder.
I am gonna be honest with you, I am all for trying to help and change people but most of them the ones who join this site just end up trying to either trying to gather support or just harass members. I don’t really think most members are really that up for trying to change actual dangerous people and it’s a detriment on the community to expect us to do that. So maybe I could make it clearer, White Nationalists and Neo-Nazis trying to actively spread their beliefs on the community should be dealt with through warnings, suspensions, and banning. Maybe the staff already does this, I know they have taken reports in the past pretty seriously. But, I personally won’t hesitate banning them.When you take someone down, based on their ideas, even if said ideas are harmful, you dont get them to change, you get them to hide, which makes getting them to change harder.
I am gonna be honest with you, I am all for trying to help and change people but most of them the ones who join this site just end up trying to either trying to gather support or just harass members. I don’t really think most members are really that up for trying to change actual dangerous people and it’s a detriment on the community to expect us to do that. So maybe I could make it clearer, White Nationalists and Neo-Nazis trying to actively spread their beliefs on the community should be dealt with through warnings, suspensions, and banning. Maybe the staff already does this, I know they have taken reports in the past pretty seriously. But, I personally won’t hesitate banning them.
I most certainly agree but that defeats the purpose of political and opinionated threads because they also have the right too spread their beliefs it’s no different than people spreading their political beliefsI am gonna be honest with you, I am all for trying to help and change people but most of them the ones who join this site just end up trying to either trying to gather support or just harass members. I don’t really think most members are really that up for trying to change actual dangerous people and it’s a detriment on the community to expect us to do that. So maybe I could make it clearer, White Nationalists and Neo-Nazis trying to actively spread their beliefs on the community should be dealt with through warnings, suspensions, and banning. Maybe the staff already does this, I know they have taken reports in the past pretty seriously. But, I personally won’t hesitate banning them.
Unpopular opinion, I am not a fan of the political section. I understand why it’s there and the such, but not a fan. That being said, I am going to be honest, I kind of said what I needed to say and really don’t see any reason to change my opinion. For obvious reasons (being that I am trans,) I have issues with those kinds of people on the forums. Every time they join, they always end up harassing trans members and it’s really annoying to deal with.I most certainly agree but that defeats the purpose of political and opinionated threads because they also have the right too spread their beliefs it’s no different than people spreading their political beliefs
It ruins others's fun.Cheating in online games is fun, especially for games where you never get banned for it.
Not really unpopular. Most people that don't use it hate it. But yeah i agree that section is bad.Unpopular opinion, I am not a fan of the political section. I understand why it’s there and the such, but not a fan. That being said, I am going to be honest, I kind of said what I needed to say and really don’t see any reason to change my opinion. For obvious reasons (being that I am trans,) I have issues with those kinds of people on the forums. Every time they join, they always end up harassing trans members and it’s really annoying to deal with.
I totally understand how you feelUnpopular opinion, I am not a fan of the political section. I understand why it’s there and the such, but not a fan. That being said, I am going to be honest, I kind of said what I needed to say and really don’t see any reason to change my opinion. For obvious reasons (being that I am trans,) I have issues with those kinds of people on the forums. Every time they join, they always end up harassing trans members and it’s really annoying to deal with.
Gritting my teeth on the rest, yada yada, entitled to your opinion.alright, i will start
-4:3 is the best aspect ratio for general purpose handheld devices (such as phones), videogames, animation and movies, widescreen is better for productivity
-Eastern European art>>>Western European art
-The Beatles are just ok
-Most screens nowadays are too big, my sweet spots are 40" for tvs, 20" for monitors, 15" for laptops and 4" for phones
-Consoles should be standardized, having three different incompatible standards with one company behind each is not good for consumers, a single standard with many manufacturers is
-Both Android and iOS are shit
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
semiofftopic, but i'd love to see smash's concept in fps form, just something like, ID Software Vs Valve would be absolute chaos, and probably a ton of fun
i didnt say there should be only one company, i said there should be one standardGritting my teeth on the rest, yada yada, entitled to your opinion.
The logic of just one company for game systems doesn't add up though. That would just end up with $2,000 gaming systems due to no competition, aka monopoly.
Ok that makes a lot more sense, it would possibly be better for all involved, assuming the companies could all agree on a format.i didnt say there should be only one company, i said there should be one standard
the current system has essentialy 3 competing standards (consoles) with one company behind each, all incompatible between each other
the system i propose has one standard, with a lot more manufacturers behind it (all making a different system, but within specifications of the standard), all compatible with each other
this has a lot of benefits
-developers only having to do one version of a given game
-more competition, as any company wanting to make a games system is now free of the worries noone will develop for their system, since it will have the same library all other systems have since day one
-cheaper prices for less developed countries, as a local company an make it, thus, lowering taxes since you wont pay import fees
-easier for consumers, no need to take exclusives into account when buying a new system, just buy what fits your budget or your aesthetic preferences
-more variation, as more companies are behind the standard, it's expected you get more choices on how you want your system to look
-more frequent updates, newer, smaller and more power efficient systems would release more often, instead of the current "wait a few years for the slim, then a few more for the more powerful one, then a few more for the next gen" instead, a next gen would be a newer, more up to date revision of the standard (kinda like msx 2, or, in the case of home video, the jump from dvd to bluray)
Thus the temptation for "funny" people to say it all the time."New normal" is an oxymoron.
Eh, I call my black friends "black" and they call me "white", none of us give a fuck.The term "white people" is prejudice