Every holy book encapsulates some of the morality, philosophies, mythos, and propaganda of their time and general location. If it's one that sticks around for whatever reason, such as christianity, the evolution of morality tends to be retroactively applied to older text. Also, they just add or edit passages directly, decades or centuries later, to update the morality, philosophies, mythos, and/or propaganda, and passing it off as original. It is the way of things. Zero confidence in any religion based on ancient text. Any good in a text does not justify or prove the fantastical or the immoral.
I also can't believe in anything supernatural. It is by definition, beyond the natural. If it cannot be explained by our current understanding of the natural world, the supernatural is not the default answer. The default answer is "we do not yet understand the mechanism of how this happens. Give us time."
You can believe whatever you'd like. Doesn't make you right, but you're perfectly allowed to believe in anything you'd like.
I also can't believe in anything supernatural. It is by definition, beyond the natural. If it cannot be explained by our current understanding of the natural world, the supernatural is not the default answer. The default answer is "we do not yet understand the mechanism of how this happens. Give us time."
You can believe whatever you'd like. Doesn't make you right, but you're perfectly allowed to believe in anything you'd like.
Last edited by osaka35,