Hacking Question Any solution for ipatched unit yet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leon8179
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 3,674
  • Replies Replies 25
  • Likes Likes 1
AFAIK it's not the trustzone part of the exploit chain that they are protecting. I don't believe SciresM is holding on to it just to annoy people.

Its a lot of details, and its not just the TrustZone but the general point of it is that Nintendo's mitigation isn't just about TrustZone and they'd know the full extent of the flaw because they know the flaw. There's only so much they can do against lolnVidia.
 
TX hasn't found anyone from whom to steal code for it yet, since they announced their supposed fix weeks ago now and it can't be that hard to show of PoC.
The fact that they know how nintendo patched it means they have an exploit.
And I'm willing to bet they have had this exploit since the very beginning, and reason for the initial delay is because fusee gelee got leaked and they didn't wanna burn another exploit.
They are probably observing the situation carefully, much rather using a publicly disclosed exploit to achieve the same thing, or wait until Mariko is out.
Why burn an exploit when you can use an existing one?
 
The fact that they know how nintendo patched it means they have an exploit.
And I'm willing to bet they have had this exploit since the very beginning, and reason for the initial delay is because fusee gelee got leaked and they didn't wanna burn another exploit.
They are probably observing the situation carefully, much rather using a publicly disclosed exploit to achieve the same thing, or wait until Mariko is out.
Why burn an exploit when you can use an existing one?

You don't need any hard exploit to get the info they presented. iPatches aren't heavily guarded info as they are read-only. They outright lied about what knowing the iPatches meant in their original release and you seem to have fallen for it hook line and sinker.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum