But it wouldn't be illegal for Nintendo to do this, and they have every reason to want A9LH installations gone.Cause its not illegal to mod your systemsm just illegal to pirate games, there no legal high ground here
But it wouldn't be illegal for Nintendo to do this, and they have every reason to want A9LH installations gone.Cause its not illegal to mod your systemsm just illegal to pirate games, there no legal high ground here
It would be illegal for Nintendo to do that, that's the point. Ps3 systems took away otheros and they got sued for it, homebrew is legal as long as it doesn't us anyone else's trademarked property (ie official sdk files) there's nothing in the law saying they have the right to take it away. It's not illegal to mod a system or run homebrewBut it wouldn't be illegal for Nintendo to do this, and they have every reason to want A9LH installations gone.
The Wii U used to delete Wii hacks from the SD didn't it?But it wouldn't be illegal for Nintendo to do this, and they have every reason to want A9LH installations gone.
How is it illegal for a 3DS system update to write a file to the SD card titled arm9loaderhax.bin that, if booted through A9LH, uninstalls A9LH and returns to 3DS to normal? Or as a part of the home menu setup on boot after the 11.3 update, the file could be written to the SD card on boot each time the 3DS starts up.It would be illegal for Nintendo to do that, that's the point. Ps3 systems took away otheros and they got sued for it, homebrew is legal as long as it doesn't us anyone else's trademarked property (ie official sdk files) there's nothing in the law saying they have the right to take it away. It's not illegal to mod a system or run homebrew
Yes, they do. Had one of my friends consoles bricked from a system update recently. He played sun and moon early on a flashcard and tried to play online. There is also a link here to an article outlining the actual thing: https://www.destructoid.com/using-piracy-devices-could-brick-your-nintendo-3ds-195895.phtmlSerously? How? Do they send you a update specifically to your console and then you brick?
I wonder what's stopping Nintendo from having an 11.3 update that covertly slips a modified arm9loaderhax.bin onto the SD card on all systems regardless of whether or not they have A9LH installed. It could be programmed to remove A9LH at boot, etc.
On systems without A9LH, the file would obviously do nothing since it would never be launched.
give it up i tried the same argument like 4 months ago . . . you will only be met with comments about how its impossible/illegal/immoral on big N's part so will never happen . . . yet its still possible for nintendo to beat a9lh regardless of popular opinionHow is it illegal for a 3DS system update to write a file to the SD card titled arm9loaderhax.bin that, if booted through A9LH, uninstalls A9LH and returns to 3DS to normal? Or as a part of the home menu setup on boot after the 11.3 update, the file could be written to the SD card on boot each time the 3DS starts up.
because its illegal to modify an individuals electronic device without a heads up, hence terms and conditions when you update any os everHow is it illegal for a 3DS system update to write a file to the SD card titled arm9loaderhax.bin that, if booted through A9LH, uninstalls A9LH and returns to 3DS to normal? Or as a part of the home menu setup on boot after the 11.3 update, the file could be written to the SD card on boot each time the 3DS starts up.
If you accept an update, that's a modification you've accepted. The modification to arm9loaderhax.bin is a part of that update hypothetically. There's no problem.because its illegal to modify an individuals electronic device without a heads up, hence terms and conditions when you update any os ever
You definitely aren't wrong. It all seems too convenient. Some one could have been paid to release the hack and then they just release an update which kills everythingThink what you want but I have a theory.Nintendo are working on a update to kill everything,including homebrew and a9lh.Remember the bug bounty? It's possible the hackers sold the vulnerabilitys already in return for the exploits we have right now.How else could we downgrade 11.2 so quickly and learn about soundhax.
Nobody uses that. They only receive UP TO $20,000 (They can still give you only $100) and after they patch it.Think what you want but I have a theory.Nintendo are working on a update to kill everything,including homebrew and a9lh.Remember the bug bounty? It's possible the hackers sold the vulnerabilitys already in return for the exploits we have right now.How else could we downgrade 11.2 so quickly and learn about soundhax.This could be the last firmware to support it before 11.2 becomes the new 3.55 that the ps3 has
You're right. Let's say a hacker goes to them thinking "I can make $20000 by telling them about this hack" then they take his exploit and use it then only pay him $100. He'd be fucked and shunned by the community. It's not worth itNobody uses that. They only receive UP TO $20,000 (They can still give you only $100) and after they patch it.
From the nand, and it's a very banal and unsustainable (should the HBC have received more frequent updates) blacklist of titleidsThe Wii U used to delete Wii hacks from the SD didn't it?
They'll only give you the money after they patch it.