- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 7,157
- Reaction score
- 5,618
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- Sacramento, California
- Website
- lazerlight.x10.mx
- XP
- 9,338
- Country


Well, now I feel silly....like Aquaman.

Both of the examples you've given were covered earlier in the thread. Nobody says that mature games are automatically better than non-mature games, we're discussing Nintendo's attitude towards mature games and whether or not they even sell on Nintendo platforms.
Exactly. The IP belongs to Platinum Games, and unlike publishing deals, this ownership does not magically "vanish" just because Nintendo funded the game. As soon as the publishing deal reaches its "deadline", Platinum Games can do whatever they feel like with Bayonetta 2. When that time comes is a matter of the specifics of the deal they signed with Nintendo.

They got bought out by Tencent.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=798584
Hope is dead and over.

That's not entirely true. Hideki Kamiya is not interested in becoming an exclusive developer, what he's interested in is working more closely with Nintendo, but of course some journalists like to put a spin on what people say.Well, Platinum has shown interest in becoming Nintendo's second party dev (...)

That's not entirely true. Hideki Kamiya is not interested in becoming an exclusive developer, what he's interested in is working more closely with Nintendo, but of course some journalists like to put a spin on what people say.
Here's Kamiya saying that he's not interested in Platinum Games becoming a second-party developer: http://www.gengame.net/2013/07/kami...-becoming-exclusive-to-a-first-party-company/
Here's Kamiya saying that he would like to work more closely with Nintendo (which implies funding from them): http://uk.ign.com/articles/2013/08/29/platinum-games-expresses-desire-for-wonderful-101-sequel

Sure. Freedom to develop Nintendo games and Nintendo games only. ;O;Also, being a second party isn't the same as a first party and they still get freedom.

If you mean for Nintendo systems, sure, but these second party dev's from Nintendo make some new IP's once in a while.Sure. Freedom to develop Nintendo games and Nintendo games only. ;O;
OH GOD DAMMIT NOThey got bought out by Tencent.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=798584
Hope is dead and over.
It doesn't really matter because that's an old, locked thread from April. From what I can gather though, Tencent is a cheap Chinese electronics manufacturer.OH GOD DAMMIT NO
What is Tencent?

Sure, if you want 90% of Capcom's content to become Japan-exclusive.![]()
Never mind. lolTurn games into Pay to Play games (Tekken, Soul Calibur, Ridge Racer), make dodgy devs (Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Z) produce the games and franchises which still have a good chunk of fans waiting to get a good game it always turns up a shit one (Dragon Ball -- at least in 2015 we'll have Dimps back for a new Dragon Ball game which is guaranteed to be with seal of quality).
So no, Bandai Namco wouldn't.
It doesn't really matter because that's an old, locked thread from April. From what I can gather though, Tencent is a cheap Chinese electronics manufacturer.
I would hate it if Nintendo took over Capcom - the company has many mature IP's like Resident Evil, Dead Rising, Devil May Cry etc. which would fall into the realm of obscurity or misuse with Nintendo's PC-friendly management looming over the developers.
It doesn't really matter because that's an old, locked thread from April. From what I can gather though, Tencent is a cheap Chinese electronics manufacturer.
Next up on humble bundle: get these awesome indie games (some of which debuting in linux)...and if you beat the average, you'll get one infamous game development company with it!They got bought for 10 cents
More likely.






