As I said, that's your speculation and interpretation. Copying a cartridge is not performing a dangerous (or foolish) experiment on it. Copying a game without modifying its ROM or physical integrity is not tampering it. Going online with a known compromised cert during SXOS days (especially when said cert was circulating all around the internet) was reasonable evidence that the Switch itself had been tampered with--that its copy-protections had been circumvented.
We have to admit that we don't know the threshold of how many copies of a cert can exist at the same time before being "banned" nor the justification that they make in doing so. Your legal opinion is shit, as your interpretation aligns with no real professional opinion or law.
It still resulted in certificates being banned which, as you stated, could "harm" the secondhand market which you insist Nintendo would not do to avoid "bad press". Therefore, you are contradicting your own statements because
now you openly admit Nintendo is and has banned game certificates. And it still doesn't change the fact that Nintendo could have stuck with only banning consoles running SX OS so this way there is no effect on the secondhand market. But they did not because Nintendo deemed those games as tampered hence why they were banned. The threshold is irrelevant; the precedent is what matters. Also, you're not a legal expert either so you bringing in the law is completely irrelevant and an attempt at changing the topic.
You have no comprehension of nuance as you interpret things with a bipolar mindset. I say you are boring or you are making me bored, and you interpret it as me saying "I am %100 uninterested". By your own admission, you want to talk just to outtalk me, while mentally checked out. You are intentionally boring.
Incorrect,
you have no comprehension of nuances because when I pointed out the definition of nuance, you didn't disagree because not only could you not disagree but you don't understand what the word actually means. Also I did not interpret your boredom, I showed you an objective definition that you cannot dismiss with a bipolar mindset.
Also its not my fault if you lack counterarguments or proof to back up your statements. I have nothing to lose when defending my points.
Also, relying on an "okay gesture" emoji as proof of agreement is a mental disability at best, but you probably just have no problem being an idiot.
This is truly the pot calling the kettle black moments of all time. You have absolutely no right to call anyone an idiot but yourself when you lack any degree of knowing what a nuance is, how to be literate, or change goalposts when you lose an argument by turning it into a pedantic sideshow. By the way, you still owe me a letter of apology, Mr. mental disability clown face.
I literally quoted, sequentially, response by response of our exchange and your bullshit. In being called out, your reaction is to grossly paraphrase pages of dialogue, cutting away context, and outright misquote me in attempt to save face. You are just trying to gatekeep the conversation and you are resorting to lying in order to do so. Good job, asshole.
False, I am not the one who shifted their argument from denying the banning of game certificates to trying to gaslight me into thinking I now agree with the opposition. I was not the person who does not know the meaning behind the words "nuance", "boredom", or "tampering". It was not me who lost the argument so they changed tactics by discussing semantics nor restoring to insults. Those were all
you. You have only yourself to blame for thinking opinions can outweigh facts. I merely defended myself with facts and logic you personally do not agree with which gives you no right to lash out as such. You started all of this so you end this. After all, you reap what you sow.
My dad works at Nintendo.
Pics or it didn't happen.
Source
