Your Opinion on Overclocking

Discussion in 'Computer Hardware, Devices and Accessories' started by Kirito-kun, Jul 30, 2013.

  1. Kirito-kun
    OP

    Kirito-kun Disciple of GabeN

    Banned
    290
    98
    Jul 23, 2013
    Canada
    22nd Floor
    Overclocking... A risky endeavour with great rewards. It is a compromise between longevity and zero-day performance. It may result in higher frame rates or dead components. It is a decision that all PC games have to make. To overclock or not to overclock, that is the question.

    I personally have seen reasonable and careful overclocking to be something that all PC gamers should do. A carefully calibrated overclock can greatly increase performance while having a small impact on life span. It is temperatures that kill chips, not higher frequencies. As long as the temperatures are low, an overclocked chip will last a long time. I have ran both my CPU and GPU overclocked for almost 2 years and have not encountered any issue. However, that's just my personal experience.

    What are your opinions on overclocking? Do you partake in it or do you find it too risky?
     
  2. Bobbybangin

    Bobbybangin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    223
    154
    Aug 9, 2010
    United States
    I overclock. I have an i7 950. I'm going to upgrade to the 990 soon. Until then I've overclocked this one from 3.07 to 3.8. Doesn't sound like much but I get much better performance. Especially with my emulators. Another plus I've noticed is that before I overclocked my computer always ran at a steady 3.07. Now it runs at lower idle speeds unless I play game or something and then it will run at full overclocked speed. To me, that seems to make sense that it would cause less stress on my processor when it's not needed to run to at full power. I've been at this speed for a year now and no issues whatsoever.
     
  3. trumpet-205

    trumpet-205 Embrace the darkness within

    Member
    4,363
    542
    Jan 14, 2009
    United States
    I once overclock, currently running at stock. To be honest, the time it takes to finish an overclocking process is too long for me. I would've to jump back and forward, find a reasonable settings, then stress the system for extended amount of time. Being a busy person, that is too much for me.

    Plus I'm running 24/7 system, and reliability is more of a concern than burst of performance.
     
  4. Celice

    Celice GBAtemp Advanced Maniac

    Member
    1,916
    354
    Jan 1, 2008
    United States
    I overclock without increasing the voltages.I find it the safest route.

    Recently overclocked my i5 and was able to run Ultra settings in Metro: Last Light at 45+ fps average. Before, that's what I got on High. I was very pleased with the gain.
     
  5. Thanatos Telos

    Thanatos Telos random stuff

    Member
    842
    187
    Sep 13, 2009
    United States
    It's viagra for your e-peen.

    EDIT: Seriously, it's only good for older CPUs. Piledrivers, Ivy/Sandy, and Haswell really don't need it to give a nice experience.
     
  6. YayMii

    YayMii hi

    Member
    4,914
    423
    Jun 24, 2009
    Canada
    that place
    I overclocked my GPU since Nvidia put supersafe voltage limits on their newer cards, so it's very unlikely that anyone's going to fry their card (unless they unlock the limiter). Because of this, I might as well since it's free performance with a bit of effort.
    My CPU remains at stock clocks though, it's running on an HP mobo which probably has no protection against overclocks, and probably doesn't have very good cooling. A higher quality mobo would be needed for safe overclocking.
     
  7. ilman

    ilman Gbatemp's Official Noise Eraser

    Member
    1,130
    243
    Jul 25, 2010
    Shibuya
    My laptop gets quite warm without over clocking, so no, I don't over clock.
     
    SuzieJoeBob likes this.
  8. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,107
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Pros
    • You can get the power of a more expensive component out of a cheaper one (most common I think).
    • You can reach higher power levels not normally sold stock.

    Cons
    • Higher power usage in most cases.
    • More heat production, meaning...
      • Your cooling system needs to work harder.
      • Your parts will die sooner than stock.
    • Need to have specific setups (mainly the motherboard nowadays) in order to OC effectively, or at all.
    • Overclock ability is on a chip-by-chip basis, somebody else could OC their CPU 0.5ghz, while you get the same model and can barely pass 0.1ghz OC.
     
    SuzieJoeBob likes this.
  9. PityOnU

    PityOnU GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    907
    327
    Jul 5, 2012
    United States
    IMO The amount of risk that comes with overclocking, in addition to the time it takes to get everything working correctly, greatly outweighs the potential performance increase.

    If you want a faster chip, save up the money and buy a faster chip from the start. Freedom isn't free, bitches.
     
    SuzieJoeBob likes this.
  10. Rayder

    Rayder Mostly lurking lately....

    Former Staff
    6,613
    132
    Jan 14, 2007
    United States
    USA
    I prefer reliability and stability to a few extra frames per second. I think it's funny that some people will buy the fastest components available and then overclock them. If I feel my current setup is no longer fast enough, I'll just buy something faster, not waste my time overclocking my old setup. The fact that I don't bother with "new" games anymore, I only have to upgrade now when my current rig craps out.
     
    SuzieJoeBob likes this.
  11. Armadillo

    Armadillo GBAtemp Psycho!

    Member
    3,569
    1,520
    Aug 28, 2003
    United Kingdom
    Parts have voltage and thermal limits, stay within them and there is no reason it will die quicker. Besides that, what about the difference between stock cooling & aftermarket/high end cooling.

    My x4 955 is overclocked and only hits 50C give or take, as I'm using a good high end cooler. The stock cooler would easily hit 55-60C at stock voltage and speed because it's junk and is only designed to keep it under 62C. So more heat on stock for me.
     
  12. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,107
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    I'm not talking about catastrophic failure, I'm talking about wear on the parts. When parts run hotter, they die sooner than when they run cooler, it's a scientific fact.

    In fact, it's the reason that IPC has been increasing instead of the clock rate. The higher the clock rate, the quicker the shit dies, so that's why after the P4 era (when Ghz was everything) everybody started moving to new architectures and more cores and stuff, to try to get more and more processing done with less cycling per second. It's also one of the reasons that everybody's looking into new cooling methods for CPUs even though your average desktop CPU is nowhere close to overheating... the cooler they can keep the chip, the more performance they can get out of it without it wearing out too soon (i.e. within the average computer's life span).

    I mean there's also other reasons for the new cooling tech (stacking chips so that area isn't a flat rectangle), but it's mainly to preserve parts.
     
    McHaggis likes this.
  13. Lilith Valentine

    Lilith Valentine GBATemp's Wolfdog™ I drool on my knife

    Member
    19,409
    19,836
    Sep 13, 2009
    Antarctica
    Between insane and insecure
    I often find the cons out weigh the pros with overclocking and often just end upgrading my hardware instead.
     
  14. FAST6191

    FAST6191 Techromancer

    pip Reporter
    23,204
    8,971
    Nov 21, 2005
    I learned the science behind it all (mainly as it is the science behind normal electronics, chip operations and heat transfer), occasionally get a good giggle out of those engaged in overclocking being more superstitious than anybody I have ever met (these people make the peerblock fans look logical) and will only tend to do it if I feel like blowing something up or the performance of it is just that little bit lower than I need for a throwaway device.

    Normally though I am all about the stability and as I am not rich enough/bored enough to build and maintain a hardened/workstation class machine for my general operations I do not go in for it and instead I might even underclock on occasion. Similarly I usually find properly setting up an OS, using a nice hard drive and maybe sticking a bit more RAM in does for everything I need to do.
    Also if the graphics make sense and the fps is somewhere around the 30 mark (hopefully someone properly cracks the motion blur thing and we can stop the 60fps farce) I am usually good enough with games and that is pretty easy to do.
     
  15. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,107
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Everybody could always buy crappy LCDs with a 500ms refresh rate!
     
  16. CompassNorth

    CompassNorth Denko (´・ω・`)

    Member
    501
    171
    Oct 18, 2011
    United States
    Seattle, WA
    Once I build a PC I'm going to overclock.
    Not going to do any insane clock speed or anything, just the same of what the majority of the people are doing.
     
  17. Naridar

    Naridar Excelsior!

    Member
    328
    83
    Oct 26, 2008
    Hungary
    I once killed my Pentium III CPU by overclocking it so since then I'm especially careful. That 10-or-so extra FPS isn't worth replacing the CPU for half my monthly income.
     
  18. FAST6191

    FAST6191 Techromancer

    pip Reporter
    23,204
    8,971
    Nov 21, 2005
    I can certainly appreciate the sentiment. However I do have to point out the P3 line ran incredibly hot which did not help overclocking and did not have a great deal of anything in the way of thermal cutout.
     
  19. Ethevion

    Ethevion Wannabe Artist

    Member
    1,783
    802
    Sep 23, 2010
    Canada
    I don't overclock. I use an i5 3570k at stock and it runs games just fine. Don't really care about increasing my FPS to a point where I can't even tell the difference.