Cubic Ninja. If you want to ask about ARM9 exploit, see Yifan Lu's blog.Huh, this is actually progressing quite fast. What's your entry point, again?
No. But I'll port to N3DS when it get working on old 3DS because I'm N3DS owner, too.Any plans to make this available for N3DS?
OSKA is an exploit and a CFW.
I finished writing ARM9 exploit! I'm going to write an easy ARM9 payload...
Cubic Ninja. If you want to ask about ARM9 exploit, see Yifan Lu's blog.
No. But I'll port to N3DS when it get working on old 3DS because I'm N3DS owner, too.
Great :}OSKA is an exploit and a CFW.
I finished writing ARM9 exploit! I'm going to write an easy ARM9 payload...
Isn''t it illegal to link it here? Perhaps on the ISO sites, but is it OK to link a ROM loader on GBAtemp?Great :}
..but the wiki and some other post say NO-PIRACY when i said CFW i meant piracy/PalentineCFW, or is the no-piracy thing just an formality thing?
basically my understanding of how OSKA will be is like the rxTools CFW which doesn't skip the legality-check of installed cia's, but as the creator of it said he already has the Piracy-enabled version of it and will not be releasing it until someone else does it first.... and so the difference between OSKA and rxTool-CFW will be that OSKA is open-source allowing someone to modify it to allow Piracy/legal checks-skipping???
there are few threads and tutorials linking to the Palentine and other Piracy-enabling CFW's here, so it is ok...Isn''t it illegal to link it here? Perhaps on the ISO sites, but is it OK to link a ROM loader on GBAtemp?
Great :}
..but the wiki and some other post say NO-PIRACY when i said CFW i meant piracy/PalentineCFW, or is the no-piracy thing just an formality thing?
basically my understanding of how OSKA will be is like the rxTools CFW which doesn't skip the legality-check of installed cia's, but as the creator of it said he already has the Piracy-enabled version of it and will not be releasing it until someone else does it first.... and so the difference between OSKA and rxTool-CFW will be that OSKA is open-source allowing someone to modify it to allow Piracy/legal checks-skipping???
yep exactly thats why i asked if anyone here is planing on modifying it for piracy once it is done/released...This imho, they just not activly support it but dont do anything to prevent it. The whole arm11/arm9 exploits are the difficult thingy, since OSKA got acess to arm9 and is open source, enabling piracy wont be difficult.
yep exactly thats why i asked if anyone here is planing on modifying it for piracy once it is done/released...
The ones who get around to modifying it for warez will end up keeping it behind closed doors. Not unlike the rest of the GBAtemp community. Pretty sure the only reason PalantineCFW exists is because he just tweaked Govanify's leaked CFW, so Palantine wouldn't take the heat himself.
As 128bit said: ((...The whole arm11/arm9 exploits are the difficult thingy, since OSKA got acess to arm9 and is open source, enabling piracy wont be difficult.))The ones who get around to modifying it for warez will end up keeping it behind closed doors. Not unlike the rest of the GBAtemp community. Pretty sure the only reason PalantineCFW exists is because he just tweaked Govanify's leaked CFW, so Palantine wouldn't take the heat himself.
I'm not bitching, though. There's a lot of possible negative repercussions for releasing something like that, so keeping it under lock and key is a good idea.
Can we please stop talking about piracy specifically? I want us to focus more on the other legitimate reasons why the signature checks should be patched out.
People shouldn't immediately scream. "Yay we can haz warez loader" all over the place at the mention of this. This is why we can't have nice things.