Not sure if you are in the same GBATemp as I am in because every time *something* bricks, GW always gets shit on regardless of whether it is related or not. It's always name-calling and pitchfork galore. As for A9LH, there was a time when the elitism was just downright terrible with all the masterrace-ing and what have you. And then there's the Menuhax guardians and the order of RXTools.
In these two pages, I have yet to see anything remotely vitriolic. The arguments are presented in a civilised manner at the very least. It's all about risk minimisation which I feel is a responsible thing to do. If you want to do down the OTPless route, knock yourself out. Nobody is saying you can't. It's the ones who know next to nothing who should be given the safest possible option.
I don't think that is an apt comparison because there is significant benefit of one option over the other.
Something more suitable would be the difference in odds of dying in a red car vs that in a blue car. If one is repeatedly higher than the other AND there is no sound explanation as to why it happens, would you still pick the one that presents with the elevated risk?