The CryENGINE VS Source Engine Topic

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by Wasmachinemann, Apr 6, 2010.

?
  1. Source Engine

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. CryENGINE

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Wasmachinemann
    OP

    Wasmachinemann GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    1
    Apr 6, 2010
    Netherlands
    in the front of my game pc.
    Because we are getting offtopic at the other thread, I decided to make this thread, Discuss everything about CryENGINE and Source Engine games in this topic.
    By teh way, Please vote in the poll what you find the best.
     
  2. playallday

    playallday Group: GBAtemp Ghost

    Member
    1
    May 23, 2008
    Canada
    [@N@[)@
    Source Engine is better programmed.

    CryENGINE looks better.
     
  3. Law

    Law rip ninjacat that zarcon made me

    Member
    3
    Aug 14, 2007
    ‭jerkland
    Hey guys I want you to compare this ROCKET LAUNCHER to this M1911 HANDGUN.
     
  4. Wasmachinemann
    OP

    Wasmachinemann GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    1
    Apr 6, 2010
    Netherlands
    in the front of my game pc.
  5. GundamXXX

    GundamXXX Ergo Ego

    Member
    2
    Sep 25, 2007
    Australia
    Prefer the Source Engine but CRYEngine looks way better
     
  6. Wasmachinemann
    OP

    Wasmachinemann GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    1
    Apr 6, 2010
    Netherlands
    in the front of my game pc.
    CryENGINE looks more nicer btw, Because it uses HDR and Bloom lighting
    Source: Wikipedia.org/wiki/CryENGINE
     
  7. Neko

    Neko Been a while.

    Member
    3
    Dec 5, 2006
    Gambia, The
    #gbatemp.net
    You know that the Source Engine supports HDR (including Bloom) right?
    Source engine is also much older than the CryENGINE BUT runs much better on most computers. The CryENGINE is horribly optimised.
    Also I [​IMG] the Source Engine more because I dig brush based mapping while the CryENGINE just does most stuff using models.