tempStyle 2 feedback thread

[shaunj66]

Please post feedback for tempStyle 2 in here.

Don't have tempStyle 2 enabled? Choose it here!

If possible please provide screenshots or URLs to bugs or concerns you have...

(thread is a WIP)

 

[WeedZ]

Chrome (Android and Windows)

-snip- misread posts

 

[Minox]

The Patreon icon spills almost entirely off of the Patreon indicators.
View attachment 89991

I'm also experiencing this using Waterfox 53.03 so it could very well be an issue for all Firefox-related browsers.

 

[shaunj66]

- Fixed mobile navigation menu icons not appearing
- Fixed Patreon logo placement

 

[TotalInsanity4]

I wonder if you could put a "view signature" option under the dropdown that contains "report post" on mobile?

 

[Dionicio3]

I made this quick little concept of "Signature Display Options"

 

[shaunj66]

- New avatars will be cropped at default resolution of 114px on upload for forum view
- Fixed account menu avatar crop error
- Added bounce to message icons
- Fixed Patron banner display (mobile)

 

[VinsCool]

I noticed something that most probably won't.... the user avatar on posts is smaller than the size its being displayed at. the image is 96×96, the img element is resized to 114×114, making it slightly blurry.

It does bug me as well. i wonder, would it be possible to make it use the original image from the profile page preview
I mean this

instead of the 96x96 avatar? That would surely make it less blurry

[EDIT] Nevermind, i missed the latest post by Mr Sonic Admin It's all good

 

[TheCyberQuake]

I found one issue involving signatures. It seems the page won't properly expand when you open a spoiler within a signature. Example photos below are taken exactly from what I see on my end with my own signature:

Spoiler: Unexposed

View attachment 89957

Spoiler: Exposed

View attachment 89956

Did my bug get completely ignored?

 

[VinsCool]

Did my bug get completely ignored?

it's not a bug. It's enforcing the 500px height in signatures.

 

[TheCyberQuake]

it's not a bug. It's enforcing the 500px height in signatures.

That's stupid imo. I can understand forcing 500px, but I've used (as have many others) spoilers in the signature to stay within the 500px limit while still having extra info that only shows for those who want to see it (by expanding the spoiler). I feel the enforced 500px shouldn't apply to expanded spoiler boxes.

 

[VinsCool]

That's stupid imo. I can understand forcing 500px, but I've used (as have many others) spoilers in the signature to stay within the 500px limit while still having extra info that only shows for those who want to see it (by expanding the spoiler). I feel the enforced 500px shouldn't apply to expanded spoiler boxes.

if there is so many things to hide in a spoiler, i believe the information tab in profile pages is better suited.
A signature should be something short, not a wall of text, hidden in a spoiler box or not.

 

[Dionicio3]

That's stupid imo. I can understand forcing 500px, but I've used (as have many others) spoilers in the signature to stay within the 500px limit while still having extra info that only shows for those who want to see it (by expanding the spoiler). I feel the enforced 500px shouldn't apply to expanded spoiler boxes.

Some people have javascript disabled

 

[jt_1258]

I'm likely just doing something already posted but
dark theme in the future for it or riot
Kappa

 

[TheCyberQuake]

if there is so many things to hide in a spoiler, i believe the information tab in profile pages is better suited.
A signature should be something short, not a wall of text, hidden in a spoiler box or not.

Imo it's much easier to open a spoiler than open an entirely new webpage, especially if you are in the middle of catching up on a large thread.

 

[Dionicio3]

Imo it's much easier to open a spoiler than open an entirely new webpage, especially if you are in the middle of catching up on a large thread.

Some people have javascript disabled

 

[TheCyberQuake]

How does JavaScript affect it?

 

[Dionicio3]

How does JavaScript affect it?

If it's disabled, it's always open

 

[VinsCool]

Actual bug report:

image shown is apparently 102x102, probably based on the new 114x114 avatar cache. The image gets cut on the right and bottom sides.

original image to compare:

 

[Youkai]

you can switch back easily
View attachment 89981

Well yeah back to v5 ? which was really bad already ... at least better than the newest one (but probably only because I got used to it a little bit)

 

[Minox]

it's not a bug. It's enforcing the 500px height in signatures.

500px is the suggested width, not the height (150px) that is actually being enforced.

Some people have javascript disabled

How does JavaScript affect it?

If it's disabled, it's always open

Javascript has nothing to do with it, it's being enforced through CSS.