Yeah a picofly one
Yeah Im gonna replace my emmc and see how it's going.But what about the emuNAND thing , restoring my current clean sysnand to a second emuNAND ? It seems to be my only current way to play online.Could be that risky ?Either it has to do with the soldering or your emmc is dying.
Thanks for your help.So...would you advise me restoring a clean NAND to second emmuNAND to play online with it since only emuNAND seems to boot ?I won't go back in time since it's my active nand that im using now .By the software side you must not go back in time for the Big N servers, read the
https://gbatemp.net/threads/nintendo-switch-banning-hub-warning.508710/
specially the post https://gbatemp.net/threads/nintendo-switch-banning-hub-warning.508710/post-10443235
Post automatically merged:
Also you an always take a backup of your nand chip and restore to a new one (there is a thread dedicated to that here, and even a Youtube video made by a temper about the issue)
But your error is normally a bad modchip installation issue, make your console inspected by someone with experience, normally is a shortcut or a damaged trace.

https://gbatemp.net/threads/switch-noob-paradise-ask-questions-here.488277/post-10452277Yeah Im gonna replace my emmc and see how it's going.But what about the emuNAND thing , restoring my current clean sysnand to a second emuNAND ? It seems to be my only current way to play online.Could be that risky ?
Yeah Im gonna replace my emmc and see how it's going.But what about the emuNAND thing , restoring my current clean sysnand to a second emuNAND ? It seems to be my only current way to play online.Could be that risky ?
Post automatically merged:
Thanks for your help.So...would you advise me restoring a clean NAND to second emmuNAND to play online with it since only emuNAND seems to boot ?I won't go back in time since it's my active nand that im using now .
Sorry really, my english isn't the most perfect but what does that mean ?Yes or no ? should I restore my current clean NAND to a second emuNAND or should I completely avoid it ? (I understood what you said about restoring my current nand to a new emmc chip , i'm gonna do that , im just waiting for my emmc to deliver)

Sorry really, my english isn't the most perfect but what does that mean ?Yes or no ? should I restore my current clean NAND to a second emuNAND or should I completely avoid it ? (I understood what you said about restoring my current nand to a new emmc chip , i'm gonna do that , im just waiting for my emmc to deliver)

https://gbatemp.net/threads/nintendo-switch-banning-hub-warning.508710Hello, i know that this question has already been asked, please, what is the safest way to play online with a hacked switch !? Which is better !? Sd file or sd partition ? Can i totally separate the stock firmware from the cfw and switch safely between them ? Any tutorial ?
Thank you.
Hello, i know that this question has already been asked, please, what is the safest way to play online with a hacked switch !? Which is better !? Sd file or sd partition ? Can i totally separate the stock firmware from the cfw and switch safely between them ? Any tutorial ?
Thank you.
How do i do that ?Safest way would be using a clean nand for all your online play, and emunand for all your homebrew/cfw stuffs.
How do i do that ?
Ok thank youIf you never installed nsp/xci or ran homebrew on sysnand ofw then you got a clean nand, just create an emunand for your homebrew/pirated games.
Ok thank you
What if i launched cfw on sysnand without installing anything ?!
Can anyone please advise? My 17.0 version 1 switch froze completely in-game today in my Emummc so had to do a hard reset. I now find if booting to either stock or launching atmosphere through injected Hekate I can get no further than the start up logos before a black screen. Tried updating to latest atmosphere/Hekate/fusee but no difference. I have a NAND backup from 2020 but is that even any use now or is my device totally bricked? I can use Hekate fine and payloads like TegraExplorer but not sure what to do. If my NAND is any good I don't have space on my SD to fit it. Not sure how to delete games if I can't get into Atmosphere though.

Exactly, you even openly admitted that user data whether it comes from the spreadsheet or ReSwitched can be biased but you bend to ReSwitched's will due to appeal to authority. However, ReSwitched are not the authority when it comes to bans; it is Nintendo as I've stated before. Therefore, both datasets should be weighed equally. But ReSwitched has never released their dataset. The fact that you do not find that suspicious is highly indicative of your bias to reach a logical conclusion. For all we know, ReSwitched could be hiding certain truths from us. After all, it wouldn't be the first thing they hid from us. That secret channel is ReSwitched is the biggest offender. Telling the community to simply "trust me bro" is a straw-man's argument. Again, all of your claims about user data are all conjecture with no real proof. So without evidence of the opposite, the spreadsheet is fact. Yet there is no user data to support ReSwitched's claims. You know the saying that wherever there is smoke, there's a fire.I never suggested that everyone can go and check all telemetry alone, but that we as community can do that, and did it for some of the known ban problems in the past.
It's also not to hard for people with the know how, to check where things connect to, and if required also what they send. Because of the permission system of hos, it's also not to hard to track what a module has access to in terms of hardware, svcs and system services.
This means we can block all connections not required, which can happen normally without modding, and thus is not a ban reason, and we can analyse the rest of the traffic based on what we know about the system or user reports.
Atmosphere already does this by default, they block trafic not required for normal online use of the system.
For people who want to be extra save, for example because they want to install stuff to the home menu, we have emunand where we can completelly block all traffic via dns and atmospheres dns overwrite. We also have prodinfo blocking, which can be used as long as all relevant server for it are blocked.
Also atmosphere in its default already prevents all things related to accidentally installing things, and thus reduces the surface where people can make mistakes. If they don't use an all on one package, there is some degree of work they need to put into knowing what they are putting on there, which reduces the chance of them not understanding my general list of things that can lead to band.
This is why I normally recommend people to use a clean fresh atmosphere when they want to do cfw stuff online or on the online nand, it reduces the number of potential mistakes the user can make.
We also don't need a full list of bans they analysed from reswitched or a spreadsheet, that alone as I mentioned will not tell us everything, since it's just User reported data, and thus contains all biases comming with it.
From mistakes done by nut understanding things, to miss reports, because something like piracy feels like not socially acceptable, there is a lot that limits the accuracy of the result you can take away from it.
For the full picture, you would need to go after every report, that doesn't have a clear ban reason, talk to them, and best let them also submit a nand dump from the beginning and from the current system. Then Analyse what data there is, that the switch tries to send.
If you do this in the best case you come to one of two results: User mistake, or identifying something we missed.
But this requires a lot of knowledge and work, and is only worth it when there is a clear reason to suspect it to be something new, like a big wave of people getting banned, that did nothing problematic.
As far as I remember, some reswitched members did go after cases of bans early on, resulting in the current state of whats unsafe, and probably unsafe.
Also if you think most users will understand something like "did you install any nsp" as "did you install any application to the switches home menu, either from a ns*, xc* or via self installing" then you are actually delisional.
At least this point alone will 100% lead to errors in your data, since it's to specific for people to grasp all it should cover.
As explained before, reswitched info about what's unsafe, and what's probably unsafe, is not based on just user reports, it's also based on reverse engeneering (and also to some degree reimplementing the system).Exactly, you even openly admitted that user data whether it comes from the spreadsheet or ReSwitched can be biased but you bend to ReSwitched's will due to appeal to authority. However, ReSwitched are not the authority when it comes to bans; it is Nintendo as I've stated before. Therefore, both datasets should be weighed equally. But ReSwitched has never released their dataset. The fact that you do not find that suspicious is highly indicative of your bias to reach a logical conclusion. For all we know, ReSwitched could be hiding certain truths from us. After all, it wouldn't be the first thing they hid from us. That secret channel is ReSwitched is the biggest offender. Telling the community to simply "trust me bro" is a straw-man's argument. Again, all of your claims about user data are all conjecture with no real proof. So without evidence of the opposite, the spreadsheet is fact. Yet there is no user data to support ReSwitched's claims. You know the saying that wherever there is smoke, there's a fire.
Also if you think users don't comprehend what "installing an .NSP file" is, think again. First off, that requires multiple different parts from acquiring a title installer to downloading the patches to sourcing the game. That information isn't readily available and must be acquired through the help of another member or a very specific guide. Without any actual proof, this is again another one of your baseless claims because you cannot refute that people are banned outside of piracy. Quit being delusional already.