Just did some database comparing and I noticed a few errors and entries that have been missed. I don't know if it's really that important, but since I'm making graphics, I do have to sift out erroneous data.
In the google spreadsheet, entry 197 has an invalid serial. Even if the serial is correct, it is so far outside the range that it is a practically useless data point. There are a few other data points I omitted because they seemed so out of place it seemed fair to assume they were a refurbish.
Now, the OP:
1.0.0
XAW100006 - XAW100128
XAW700014 - XAW700047
XAJ100022 - XAJ100042
XAJ400007 - XAJ400091
XAJ700012 - XAJ700065
2.1.0
XAW100139 - XAW100140
XAW700049 - XAW700050
XAJ400105 - XAJ400136
XAJ700078 - XAJ700085
2.2.0
XAW100158 - XAW100173
XAJ400105 - XAJ400174
XAJ700091 - XAJ700093
2.3.0
XAW100175 - XAW100214
XAW400012 - XAW400016
XAW700050 - XAW700127
XAJ100086
XAJ400105 - XAJ400155
XAJ700098 - XAJ700132
3.0.0
XAW100154 - XAW100228
XAW400017 - XAW400033
XAW700059 - XAW700079
XAJ100109 - XAJ100133
XAJ400169 - XAJ400191
XAJ700133 - XAJ700153
3.0.1
XAW100218 - XAW100320
XAW400028 - XAW400036
XAJ100121 - XAJ100140
XAJ400210 - XAJ400267
XAJ700150 - XAJ700182
3.0.2
XAW100295 - XAW100420
XAW400081
XAJ10018
XAJ400267 - XAJ400281
XAJ700197 - XAJ700258
4.0.1
XAW100439 - XAW100516
XAW400081 - XAW400088
XAJ1002523
Only had time to do the XAJ data points today, will work on XAW later.
In the 1.0.0 section:
for serial series XAJ400, an unidentified user (listed in the spreadsheet) has submitted XAJ40004, which is lower than your listed min value of XAJ400007. Theoretically however, 1.0.0 on all serial series should start at 000
In the 2.1.0 section
for serial series XAJ400, the max value of XAJ400136 I could not source. The only two serials that match are running 2.3.0. The next highest value for 2.1.0 is XAJ400126, submitted by krot (listed in the spreadsheet)
for serial series XAJ700, astra221 (listed on the spreadsheet) has submitted XAJ700070, which is lower than your listed min value of XAJ700078.
In the 2.2.0 section:
for serial series XAJ700, Resaec (page 33 of this thread) has submitted XAJ700090, which is lower than your listed min value of XAJ700091
In the 3.0.0 section:
for serial series XAJ100, shakin (listed in the spreadsheet) has submitted XAJ100138, which is higher than your listed max value of XAJ100133
for serial series XAJ400, cysin (listed in the spreadsheet) has submitted XAJ400161, which is lower than your listed min value of XAJ400169
In the 3.0.1 section:
for serial series XAJ100, tjok3000 (page 18 of this thread) has submitted XAJ100158, which is higher than your listed max value of XAJ100140
for serial series XAJ400, an unidentified user (listed in the spreadsheet) has submitted XAJ400197, which is lower than your min value XAJ400210
for serial series XAJ400, Goombi has submitted XAJ400288, (page 38 of this thread) which is higher than your listed max value of XAJ400267
In the 3.0.2 section:
for serial series XAJ100, South Cape and Yanda (page 22 and 21 of this thread) have submitted XAJ100175, which is lower than your sole entry of XAJ10018X (from sthetix, page 27)
for serial series XAJ100, Martin l. (listed in the spreadsheet) has submitted XAJ100182, which is more specific/higher than your sole entry of XAJ10018X
for serial series XAJ700, shakin (listed in the spreadsheet) has submitted XAJ700272, which is higher than your listed max value of XAJ700258.