Gaming Starwars Battlefront

  • Thread starter Thread starter starfighter1
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 2,077
  • Replies Replies 13
Looks bad? Bad graphics? How in any way do visuals determine the quality of a game. This is why we are getting shallow, un-original, un-engaging games.

People are more concerned with how pretty a DS title can look, as opposed to how solid the gameplay is. Everyone wants games to look fantastic, I'd rather play an awsomely written text adventure than some POS with amazing visuals.

Talk about judging books by their cover.
 
Moots said:
Looks bad? Bad graphics? How in any way do visuals determine the quality of a game. This is why we are getting shallow, un-original, un-engaging games.

People are more concerned with how pretty a DS title can look, as opposed to how solid the gameplay is. Everyone wants games to look fantastic, I'd rather play an awsomely written text adventure than some POS with amazing visuals.

Talk about judging books by their cover.

I totally agree with you, I grew on on the NES and Genesis. Back then a good looking game was Sonic 2, now everyone complains if something is not 3d.

Anyways, I am still gonna pick this up, I enjoyed the other Battlefront games, might as well try this too
smile.gif
 
I'm kinda bummed it's not a full-fledged TPS Battlefront (more of an isometric or overhead view), but as long as they capture the traditional Battlefront feel, I'll be happy.
 
i think this might be fun if you move with d-pad and aim with stylus, kinda like geometry wars.

space battles look planar (you can only go left/right not up/down) lame...

multiplayer is up to only 4 people, anyone know if that's online or just local?
 
Gah.

After playing Modern Warfare Mobilized I was expecting a nice FPS... But it's not. It's poop.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum