The Gameplay over graphics is an arguement I have bought up for years with my mates and brothers, but tbh the Wii is kind of shite, only a handful of games play well, and only a couple are good, on the otherhand, where the 360 is a graphic bitch since the PS3 some really good games have been released, my guessing is they know they wont look as good as a PS3 so they moved to gameplay.
All i'm going to say about this game is pfft, sonic is old skwl, like Mario (N64 was best, should of been left there) and turning him into a Werehog??? this is just a stupid nobcheese's "Look at this story!!! ITS SOOOOOOO ORIGINALLL" script for the game, they are always trying to bring new life into Sonic.. this time they actually added NEW life into sonic.... we'll see
This guy knows the score!!!
I allways believed wii developers just wern't trying hard enough to make games look good, because RE4 on gamecube is still the best looking wii game... But now 2 years later I think maybe thats the best the wii can really do, nothing more than xbox 1 graphics if your lucky... I definitley didn't buy a wii because it was a graphics powerhouse, but I didn't expect the next generation nintendo to be on par graphically with a ps2
I know im gonna get the hell flamed out of me from people that havn't yet come to that realisation too.
Gameplay is more useful than graphics, true, but at the same time I can't believe how many people say graphics don't matter. It can be the best game in universe but if it looks like poo whos going to want to play it? without any graphics, you wouldn't be able to see your precious gameplay to start with.
on topic, the game looks alright. I'm willing to bet it'd get a 6.5 from IGN
Hey, I would agree with you if this seemed like Xbox quality development.
This is the PS2 version with more TEV shaders and a LOWER (30fps) framerate.
There's no excuse for that.
QUOTE(CockroachMan @ Nov 15 2008, 03:53 PM)