I'm definitely hunting through Target this week for an r4
on topic; OoTHax is a secondary because the game
A. Needs to store a payload in the save (That Cubic-Ninja guy is officially a mongol)
B. Needs something else to install it. OoTHax is the only secondary that Powersaves works for, But you are using Powersaves to install the exploit. Powersaves just happen to be this something else
Guy: "But you don't need another hacked system!"
Ricken: "Because OoT doesn't use per-cart encryption. Every other secondary does, so OoT is the mongol of the secondaries... but you are still using something else to modify your save data. Secondary. End of discussion."
All you're doing is repeating the definition, which doesn't answer the question of why you want to use that definition to begin with.
People care about "can I do this just by buying something, or do I need to find someone with a hacked machine?"
People don't care about "do I have to buy a game, or do I have to buy a game and a Powersaves".
It makes more sense to use a definition that is about something people care about.
Edit: I went through this thread and counted about 13 replies (depending on how you count) by people who seem to think that a good response to "maybe we should change the definition" is "this is the definition". If I am asking why you want a definition, then answering "this is the definition" doesn't make any sense. I'm talking about, you know, changing the definition. If I change it, it won't be the same definition that you just told me.
Last edited by Jiro2,








