Sneek Speed and Cluster Size

Discussion in 'Wii - Hacking' started by apoptygma, Jul 8, 2010.

Jul 8, 2010
  1. apoptygma
    OP

    Member apoptygma GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    687
    Country:
    Australia
    Just wondering how people have seen the performance of Sneek shift when using larger or smaller clusters. It's been identified that there is a bit of code restricting the loading of data to one cluster at a time and so in theory, formatting an SD with the largest clusters possible should provide the best speed. The only problem here is that some compatibility issues might arise from not using standard 32k clusters.
     
  2. thesund0g

    Member thesund0g GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    The Boonies
    Country:
    Antarctica
    You should see better performance out of large clusters based on what Crediar said. Just bear in mind you will have more "slack space" as a cluster cannot house more than one file. All that can add up with a smaller card, but it probably isn't a problem.
     

Share This Page