Well, so far it seems that it is indeed runs the same base. But again, I just assumed that this vulnerability would be in place, since SigHax is still in progress, and it might be possible that it haven't been reported to them as Switch development was processed. Or there might be a possibility of slightly different, yet quite similar vulnerability still might be in Switch hardware. I'm just curious of possibilities, chances and if any of those will be taken into account when hackers will be peeking deeper in what Switch is capable of, not assuming that Nintendo would apply the same methods to fail miserably on securing their own creation.