- Joined
- Aug 23, 2009
- Messages
- 3,010
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 29
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 1,711
- Country
What's that like?CrashmanX said:You all sadden me. Not a single one of you mentioned WipEout HD.
What's that like?CrashmanX said:You all sadden me. Not a single one of you mentioned WipEout HD.
Vampire Hunter D said:Futuristic speedy racer with 'cars' that float over the track like f-zero, but with weapons. It's pretty, and it's fast, but you either love it or don't give a damn and I fall into the 'who cares' group as I know it's a good game but it gives me no pleasure playing it and I've played a few of them.
It sounds fun. I think I'll try it.CrashmanX said:Vampire Hunter D said:Futuristic speedy racer with 'cars' that float over the track like f-zero, but with weapons. It's pretty, and it's fast, but you either love it or don't give a damn and I fall into the 'who cares' group as I know it's a good game but it gives me no pleasure playing it and I've played a few of them.
You sir have not played enough then. You also have not noticed the fact that its one of the few PS3 games that actually put out in 1080p quality and looks great. Possibly also you do not have a friend to play this with, or maybe some online companions? Have you never seen the detail that goes into the game, the sheer beauty of it all? The fact that you can race around tracks at 100mph one second and instantly be moving 1000+ the next? I believe you need to play some more WipEout HD Fury if you have not.
He said it was 'pretty', what more do you want from him?! Just because you like it doesn't mean everyone will, accept it and move on. Also graphics =/= fun...CrashmanX said:Vampire Hunter D said:Futuristic speedy racer with 'cars' that float over the track like f-zero, but with weapons. It's pretty, and it's fast, but you either love it or don't give a damn and I fall into the 'who cares' group as I know it's a good game but it gives me no pleasure playing it and I've played a few of them.
You sir have not played enough then. You also have not noticed the fact that its one of the few PS3 games that actually put out in 1080p quality and looks great. Possibly also you do not have a friend to play this with, or maybe some online companions? Have you never seen the detail that goes into the game, the sheer beauty of it all? The fact that you can race around tracks at 100mph one second and instantly be moving 1000+ the next? I believe you need to play some more WipEout HD Fury if you have not.
I have it for Xbox. Same with Burnout Paradise.Lubbo said:well for an RPG you've got Demon's Souls which is exclusive but it is really hardcore
racers you've got Gran Turismo 5 coming out soon, i have Burnout Paradise which is fun
shooters personally im waiting for Medal of Honor or Call of Duty: Black Ops, surprised you don't have Modern Warfare 2
antwill said:He said it was 'pretty', what more do you want from him?! Just because you like it doesn't mean everyone will, accept it and move on. Also graphics =/= fun...
That's sick! I need to give that game a try!CrashmanX said:Oh and did I mention you can play any music on your PS3 in WipEout HD? During races you can listen to any of your music, or make specific playlists for it, tis quite nice.
No it doesn't, it doesn't influence fun at all, you can have the best graphics in the world and if you have terrible gameplay then I can tell you now, it will not make it the slightest fun at all. Once again you are wrong. Trying to argue otherwise is only showing how naive you are. People would choose Halo 3 in HD because it looks nice but they will NOT say "oh yeah the graphics made the game fun."CrashmanX said:No, they do not = fun, but they most defiantly influence it. If you could play Halo 3 in the same quality as Halo 1 or you could play it in HD, which would you choose? I'm pretty sure 90% of the people would choose HD, those of course who do would say its slightly more fun thanks to the improved Graphics.
Then I'm guessing the original Mario isn't fun at all?QUOTE said:No, they do not = fun, but they most defiantly influence it. If you could play Halo 3 in the same quality as Halo 1 or you could play it in HD, which would you choose? I'm pretty sure 90% of the people would choose HD, those of course who do would say its slightly more fun thanks to the improved Graphics.
antwill said:No it doesn't, it doesn't influence fun at all, you can have the best graphics in the world and if you have terrible gameplay then I can tell you now, it will not make it the slightest fun at all. Once again you are wrong. Trying to argue otherwise is only showing how naive you are. People would choose Halo 3 in HD because it looks nice but they will NOT say "oh yeah the graphics made the game fun."
Actually, yes. People would choose the HD version and quite a few people would say this, how do know this? Because I've been shown this in real life. People had an option, they could play Halo 1 or Halo 3 (Not knowing the difference and having never played any Halo game either) most of them went for 3 over 1. One of the big influencing issues, graphics. People tend to go towards something that looks nicer.
HD just allows for more stuff as a higher rez to happen on screen, that's it. If anyone is so shallow as to believe that a prettier more detailed image makes a game better, or worse yet, good at all -- you just need to put the controller down, sell your shit, buy a blu-ray player and an even more massive tv and sound system and go live in your eye candy land where your best instinct for 'quality' will be served best.Okami Wolfen said:Then I'm guessing the original Mario isn't fun at all?
Look, HD is nice, but I hardly notice it when I'm playing a game.
I never said that, I said they influence fun. Please people, learn to read properly.
QUOTE(Vampire Hunter D @ Aug 14 2010, 12:21 AM)