Or an iPod/iDevice. =)DeathStrudel said:I think they're making a bigger mistake by trying to avoid Nintendo's mistake. By missing the holiday season they're gonna miss out on a lot of parents who would be buying these things for their kids; it wouldn't even matter if there were any good games available. Now parents are just gonna get their kids a 3DS for Christmas instead.
wow, what a crybaby.jalaneme said:Waflix said:According to WikiPedia only Europe will get the PSV in 2012, North-America will get it in 2011 (fourth quarter).
well done sony, what a great way to backstab your EU fans.... again and again and again and again, keep doing it sony and you will get a medal of honour for being the most hated games company in europe.
while they delay the ps vita till 2012 i will be enjoying my 3ds and giving my money to NINTENDO who deserve my money way more than sony does.
QUOTE(koimayeul @ Aug 4 2011, 01:53 PM) Good Lord again Europe last served.. and with a higher price tag of course -_-'
yep, that is the way it always goes.
As big as what? They never said they would release it this year in all the world. It'll be released early next year.Slyakin said:With a delay as big as this, and a launch that is still shitty, I'm starting to doubt the Vita.
But you still need to pay monthly charges, plus 3G is quite slow (my iPhone's 3G speed compared to home Wi-Fi is a huge gap)Veho said:Internet on the go? With 3G you aren't tethered to a hotspot.cwstjdenobs said:That's something I don't understand, why pay out for 3G when you will still have to find a WiFi connection to play games online? And if you have to use WiFi to game online why not just use that faster, cheaper option to dl content?
chris888222 said:But you still need to pay monthly charges, plus 3G is quite slow (my iPhone's 3G speed compared to home Wi-Fi is a huge gap)
Wi-Fi version for me. However yeah like I say, different people have different taste.
cwstjdenobs said:^^ Sorry I'd actually being told it won't even let you try to game online when using 3G instead of WiFi. It's a console, so what's the point of the 3G then? If that's not true I also agree with just how generally crap 3G is.
That's true.Guild McCommunist said:chris888222 said:But you still need to pay monthly charges, plus 3G is quite slow (my iPhone's 3G speed compared to home Wi-Fi is a huge gap)
Wi-Fi version for me. However yeah like I say, different people have different taste.
...But it's still internet on the go, which is the whole point of having 3G. WiFi is always better than 3G in terms of speed and such, but it's not always there. That's kinda why people use 3G and why it exists.
You won't be able to do online gaming on 3G but you can probably use the PSN for messaging and checking out your friends and you can do your standard selection of web browsing and stuff.
Well, Sony's first quarter can go as far as April/May, if I am not mistaken. However, I probably shouldn't have said "big".Maedhros said:As big as what? They never said they would release it this year in all the world. It'll be released early next year.Slyakin said:With a delay as big as this, and a launch that is still shitty, I'm starting to doubt the Vita.
Also the lauch right now is better than anything the competition has to offer (besides one remake), and it's not even released.
Well, I'm sure PSV will have a much smoother online. It already has PSN, together with it's powerful 'body'.heartgold said:3G online gaming would be sweet, lets see how this turns out. I don't take my handheld's outside sooo WiFi seems good for gaming and no lag. Now if they can get little to no lag on 3G gaming that'd destroy Nintendo's 3DS. It'd seem like ancient technology limited.
That's the ONE GAME I WANT! But it's not launch... ;O; Just launch window.prowler_ said:waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat.Slyakin said:and a launch that is still shitty.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2c35Ab--Vs[/youtube]