There are various sources for the COVID-19 death numbers, and they comport with what's seen around the world without your conspiratorial explanations.
What about supply and demand is conspiratorial @Lacius?
There are various sources for the COVID-19 death numbers, and they comport with what's seen around the world without your conspiratorial explanations.
It's only conspiratorial when you jump to conclusions.What about supply and demand is conspiratorial @Lacius?
You've still not provided a single link to this post, which is what this was about in the first placeWhat about supply and demand is conspiratorial @Lacius?
Why are you still dragging this out? Post a link, at this point it could literally be anything, just as long as we understand where this information came from.99% of the people who died right after getting vaccinated "cannot be evaluated" of it being due to the vaccine due to it possibly being a coincidence yet 110% of people who died while having coronavirus in their system are all corona deaths. This is an obvious double-standard.
He's objectively only got conjecture and conspiracy theories.You've still not provided a single link to this post, which is what this was about in the first place
Why are you still dragging this out? Post a link, at this point it could literally be anything, just as long as we understand where this information came from.
I am aware but I am interested if this actually came from somewhere or if he just made it up. At least the other conspiracy nuts actually post their sources. Sure, they misquote them or they have links to some cult, but at least they are being posted.He's objectively only got conjecture and conspiracy theories.
It is not a jump to say that financially incentivized bias is going to yield results. That's not a conspiracy theory, lol. That's economics.It's only conspiratorial when you jump to conclusions.
I feel like you are trying to change the topic because you still got nothing on literally everything you've posted. Just in case you forgot, we still haven't moved past this pointIt is not a jump to say that financially incentivized bias is going to yield results. That's not a conspiracy theory, lol. That's economics.
99% of the people who died right after getting vaccinated "cannot be evaluated" of it being due to the vaccine due to it possibly being a coincidence yet 110% of people who died while having coronavirus in their system are all corona deaths. This is an obvious double-standard.
Actually, it's an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory when you say it's what's happening, particularly when we have evidence the numbers are right. The deaths are more homogenous than the hospitalizations, and the numbers comport with what we're seeing all around the world where your alleged biases don't exist.It is not a jump to say that financially incentivized bias is going to yield results. That's not a conspiracy theory, lol. That's economics.
Actually, it's an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory when you say it's what's happening, particularly when we have evidence the numbers are right. The deaths are more homogenous than the hospitalizations, and the numbers comport with what we're seeing all around the world where your alleged biases don't exist.
You're doing a lot more than acknowledging possible pressures for bias. You're saying it's happening. Demonstrate this claim.
This is news to me. Are you suggesting that the methods of data collection differ that much from country to country? If so, how could that be seen as "comporting"? Afaik, the methods of data collection are largely led by the recommendations of the WHO and CDC.all around the world where your alleged biases don't exist
Instead of repeating your claim, can you demonstrate this is actually causing a significant misreporting to occur?What is happening is that the numbers are financially incentivized to report one way over the other. This will get a larger number than an honest %100 accountability--the %110 I reference. I think that's generous. You are being unreasonable.
I think he means that CDC's definition of unvaccinated is “<14 (less than 14) days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available.” This means adverse events and deaths occurring within these circumstances would be counted by CDC as "unvaccinated" if they are even counted at all.I feel like you are trying to change the topic because you still got nothing on literally everything you've posted. Just in case you forgot, we still haven't moved past this point
Suggesting that it is more reasonable to doubt that financial incentive would influence a reporting outcome is outrageous.Instead of repeating your claim, can you demonstrate this is actually causing a significant misreporting to occur?
Suggesting how something could happen is not evidence it's actually occurring. I've also made numerous points as to how a significant misreporting is unlikely.Suggesting that it is more reasonable to doubt that financial incentive would influence a reporting outcome is outrageous.
It's like denying that lobbying exists.
I think he means that CDC's definition of unvaccinated is “<14 (less than 14) days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available.” This means adverse events and deaths occurring within these circumstances would be counted by CDC as "unvaccinated" if they are even counted at all.
Paying people to have Covid is going to yield more people with Covid than if you were not to pay them. If you are bought and paid for by Pfizer, too, I would not be surprised.Suggesting how something could happen is not evidence it's actually occurring. I've also made numerous points as to how a significant misreporting is unlikely.
I like how you deliberately ignored and misquoted details, then only included the scary sounding numbers to make it sound worse.That's an aspect I didn't consider. I was mainly referencing this (English for you).
That's not what happened at all. Nice try.I like how you deliberately ignored and misquoted details and just only included the scary sounding numbers to make it sound worse.
Saying fraud could be committed is not evidence fraud has been committed.Paying people to have Covid is going to yield more people with Covid than if you were not to pay them. If you are bought and paid for by Pfizer, too, I would not be surprised.
Two doses, which is what's normally meant by fully vaccinated, is only somewhat effective against omicron. Even with a booster, there is a significant (but low) chance of getting omicron. The good news is your symptoms were likely milder because of the vaccinations.got it twice and some how still am the only person in my house whose been fully vaccinated